Whilst you were distracted by Boris’s trip to Kyiv, the UK Gov. quietly published data confirming the Fully Vaccinated accounted for 92% of all Covid-19 Deaths in March
(dailyexpose.uk)
☠️ WE TRIED TO WARN YOU 💉
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (70)
sorted by:
I'm looking at table 14 on page 45. I see cases higher in vaxxed, but almost everything else (hospitalizations & deaths) the vaxxed are either a teensy bit better off (generally for people aged <50) or significantly better off (generally ages 50+) than unvaxxed. Personally, as someone under 50, I don't feel the improved outcomes is worth the risk, so I'm keeping my pureblood status. However, to make a big deal of this study as if the vax is causing population collapse.... well, that's not happening... yet.
And the number of cases is misleading, as the omitted footer of the table that was explains. People who are not vaccinated are also less likely to get tested when they have a sniffle so their rates are skewed very low. When things actually get bad, they show up at the hospital in higher numbers per capita.
These posts are almost always wrong because they cherry pick specific data and don't show you what you don't want to see.
The most important point, regardless, is that unvaccinated folks are going to hospital more and are dying more. That fact was omitted on purpose by the posted article, which is super misleading.
Do you have some evidence to the contrary?
The original document that is misquoted and misrepresented in this article points out several reasons why these unadjusted numbers should not be used to gauge vaccine efficiency:
I'm fine with taking a new look at data but this article wilfully omits key findings that make it look very misleading.
If anything, the unvaxxed are being forced to test more, not less.
The original document that is misquoted and misrepresented in this article points out several reasons why these unadjusted numbers should not be used to gauge vaccine efficiency: