when did I say clotting happens when PTTs hit 150+? wtf? Why do so many dweebs argue through fallacies? The key is not to believe anything but to be open to everything. All you did was criticize without providing any contrary evidence. You seemed to have bashed both perspectives because of an apparent contradiction, hey buddy why don't you contribute something! lol why don't you say "it cant be clotting because of _________ or it can't be bleeding because of ______" no instead you just say psyop and then come at me with fallacies. YIKES
He said remdesivir causes bleeding as evidenced by elevated bleeding times. He also says the vax causes the same thing as evidenced by D dimer results. I didn’t say shit other than this doesn’t add up because they are in fact opposite effects. The vax and covid have been shown time after time to make you clot, thus the name clot shot. If your D dimer is elevated, you likely have a clot.
Just because you bleed doesn’t mean you clot. That’s what you said in your previous post and called me a genius, yes? So shut the fuck up about me not making a plain argument and criticizing when all you can do is name call and not comprehend what you read.
but that's exactly the problem right there, if you listen to something and then throw the baby out with the bath water because someone said something contradictory, my goodness man nobody would ever learn anything! And my point still stands, why don't you try to add something to the conversation opposed to just "psyop" LOL. There have been so many things I've heard that I thought were contradictory just because I didn't have the proper understanding. Bring your pride down just a notch and be willing to look at the evidence itself instead of taking something someone says as Gospel.
when did I say clotting happens when PTTs hit 150+? wtf? Why do so many dweebs argue through fallacies? The key is not to believe anything but to be open to everything. All you did was criticize without providing any contrary evidence. You seemed to have bashed both perspectives because of an apparent contradiction, hey buddy why don't you contribute something! lol why don't you say "it cant be clotting because of _________ or it can't be bleeding because of ______" no instead you just say psyop and then come at me with fallacies. YIKES
He said remdesivir causes bleeding as evidenced by elevated bleeding times. He also says the vax causes the same thing as evidenced by D dimer results. I didn’t say shit other than this doesn’t add up because they are in fact opposite effects. The vax and covid have been shown time after time to make you clot, thus the name clot shot. If your D dimer is elevated, you likely have a clot.
Just because you bleed doesn’t mean you clot. That’s what you said in your previous post and called me a genius, yes? So shut the fuck up about me not making a plain argument and criticizing when all you can do is name call and not comprehend what you read.
but that's exactly the problem right there, if you listen to something and then throw the baby out with the bath water because someone said something contradictory, my goodness man nobody would ever learn anything! And my point still stands, why don't you try to add something to the conversation opposed to just "psyop" LOL. There have been so many things I've heard that I thought were contradictory just because I didn't have the proper understanding. Bring your pride down just a notch and be willing to look at the evidence itself instead of taking something someone says as Gospel.