In grad school this is what we called “true but useless” analysis.
The salient point here is not what caused the numbers. The salient point is the numbers themselves. The only analysis needed here is “something unnatural (meaning caused by an intelligent agent or agents) has occurred”.
Again, good analysis… wrong focus (for this thread, and only IMO).
I did the analysis because they are going to try to blame COVID for the extra deaths. It is important to show that most of the excess deaths were in fact from what they did and not from any virus. The point of my analysis is that whatever COVID is, it could not have caused most of this and that the measures they used (which includes lockdowns, canceling hospital treatments for many people, etc.) and vaccines explain it better.
There is some better data out now which correlates alleged deaths with COVID and vaccination rates for all of Canada for the same 0-44 age group. Really puts things into perspective especially with the extra lines of data (the excess deaths with COVID and vaccination uptake rates): https://nitter.net/pic/media%2FFP8ElsxXEAchYO0.jpg%3Fname%3Dorig
I did miss one thing. This is a graph for the 0-44 age group. The one whose outcomes from COVID are not much worse than the flu if at all. For older age groups, it might be different, but COVID is not serious for the average 0-44 year. This suggests the people that argued, protect the vulnerable and leave everyone else along, were right. Not that we needed more proof of that.
In grad school this is what we called “true but useless” analysis.
The salient point here is not what caused the numbers. The salient point is the numbers themselves. The only analysis needed here is “something unnatural (meaning caused by an intelligent agent or agents) has occurred”.
Again, good analysis… wrong focus (for this thread, and only IMO).
I did the analysis because they are going to try to blame COVID for the extra deaths. It is important to show that most of the excess deaths were in fact from what they did and not from any virus. The point of my analysis is that whatever COVID is, it could not have caused most of this and that the measures they used (which includes lockdowns, canceling hospital treatments for many people, etc.) and vaccines explain it better.
There is some better data out now which correlates alleged deaths with COVID and vaccination rates for all of Canada for the same 0-44 age group. Really puts things into perspective especially with the extra lines of data (the excess deaths with COVID and vaccination uptake rates): https://nitter.net/pic/media%2FFP8ElsxXEAchYO0.jpg%3Fname%3Dorig
I did miss one thing. This is a graph for the 0-44 age group. The one whose outcomes from COVID are not much worse than the flu if at all. For older age groups, it might be different, but COVID is not serious for the average 0-44 year. This suggests the people that argued, protect the vulnerable and leave everyone else along, were right. Not that we needed more proof of that.
Here's another interesting chart. - Deaths from vaccines over the years:
https://myvalleynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/06-18-21-OP-Reeder-Graph-696x347.jpg
In common sense it tells us shit is happening.