And by famous I mean, people GAW'ers would know. Candice? Stew? Vandersteel? Voight? Cmaaaan.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (57)
sorted by:
Which part of "anon" was confusing?
I'd like to know if there are any Anon's from the Chans that actually got responses from Q on this board.
I consider that "famous" in our community.
Was included in this, that was cool.
https://media.greatawakening.win/post/SSSntueQ.jpeg
I never posted to Qs posts but I read them intently. I honestly can't believe how big the movement has become from it's humble origins, Q took a lot of shit on their threads from shills and doubters and I always somewhat expected it to fizzle, look at us now. The past proving future. WWG1WGA
There are some that I have recognized, but its all about timing for the credits to roll for that particular film.
When the time is right they will show up and have to prove themselves.
IMO, for the time being, I'm fine with them remaining in the shadows on here.
Exactly. I personally know someone, a celebrity in their chosen field of art and music, who has been a closeted conservative for years, but dares not reveal that to the world. It would be the end of their career and they have many years of performing left. OP is expecting people to give up their livelihoods for a momentary flash of suicidal courage. Won't happen unless a celebrity has tons and tons of FU money.
That's a shame. Someone who won't live as their authentic self because of muh money, muh career, is a coward imo.
Well let us all see, with proof and documentation, you give up your job. I'll wait.
You'll wait. How impressive. No job is worth lying to yourself on a daily basis. There ARE other ways to make a living. Integrity helps a person sleep at night. What's so bad about being a conservative? It takes people with integrity and possibly guts, to live as what they are. I would have more respect for some misguided 'trans person' who believes they are living their 'real' life than for someone like your celebrity friend who hides who s/he is because they're afraid of losing a bunch of benefits that the vast majority of people will never have.
I'd argue that "there are anons" but we do not have to be anons. The anons are important, but we can also just be patriots.
If someone were to "out" themselves, that would create division. Any "hero" would have their words hold more weight by such virtue for many people, for others it would do the opposite. Their arguments or statements would be allowed to be weaker for many, reducing the need for critical thinking (in truth, increasing the need, but it would lull people into believing the opposite).
We have been trained to "trust the experts, trust the leaders", etc. Learning how to not do that, is part of the GA. Such nonanon activity would probably not help in that learning process. It is already a problem on this board with regards to the mods. Such "outting" would only make it worse.
Un fortunately i agree even tho God wants all of us in the light. How to rectify this for those .. eventually we all stop hiding like ((( they))) do.