Possible Twitter scenarios. No matter which one, we win. - The Great Awakening

258

Possible Twitter scenarios. No matter which one, we win. (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 2 years ago by Factfiler 2 years ago by Factfiler +259 / -1

50 comments download

50 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (50)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– Bgtholt88 2 points 2 years ago +3 / -1

DWAC is not going to buy twitter.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– libtards_r_stoopid 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Why do you say that

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– Bgtholt88 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

The purpose of DWAC is to merge/buy out a private company and take it public. There’s hundreds of acquisition companies just like it..(SPACs). This isn’t some special operation deployed by trump to buy up companies. I honestly do not know why so many people that are very intelligent have done zero research on what DWAC is, and hear them say ridiculous thing like “Trumps acquisition company might buy Twitter or CNN!!”.

I’ve heard the X22 guy say it a few times as well. He probably needs to talk to someone who is an expert in SPACs, because what he id saying makes him sound silly.

I’d bet that DWAC can’t even legally buy twitter or any public company for that matter.

Now.. Trump Media could. But I highly doubt that as well. And I’d be willing to say Twitters board would deny any such offer..

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– libtards_r_stoopid 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Ok thanks for your reply

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q