The answer to "born that way" is that implies a genetic cause. Since gays rarely reproduce, if it was genetic, it should have been bred out of the population thousands of years ago. Simple logic.
Yes, there would be limited numbers of queers if it was solely genetic, but not anywhere near the numbers we see now. Most recessive traits, such as in eye color, hair color, height, etc. continue to exist widely because they don't affect life or reproduction. Being queer, if it were actually caused by a recessive gene, would be slower to propagate than blue eyes, for example, because the queers with the double recessive gene wouldn't be passing on their genes. On the other hand, someone with blue eyes is just as likely to have kids as someone with brown eyes.
Being queer is not genetic. It's a lifestyle choice.
The answer to "born that way" is that implies a genetic cause. Since gays rarely reproduce, if it was genetic, it should have been bred out of the population thousands of years ago. Simple logic.
Allegedly the rate of homosexuality is about 3%
Coincidently the rate of birth defects is also about 3%
People have siblings. Additionaly, have you ever heard of a recessive trait?
Yes, there would be limited numbers of queers if it was solely genetic, but not anywhere near the numbers we see now. Most recessive traits, such as in eye color, hair color, height, etc. continue to exist widely because they don't affect life or reproduction. Being queer, if it were actually caused by a recessive gene, would be slower to propagate than blue eyes, for example, because the queers with the double recessive gene wouldn't be passing on their genes. On the other hand, someone with blue eyes is just as likely to have kids as someone with brown eyes.
Being queer is not genetic. It's a lifestyle choice.
Molested fags create molested fags, simple.