Excellent point. Michael Savage always equated it to the "Do you still beat your wife?" Question. The accusation is there and the denial still leaves a bad taste.
It reminds me of how the left accused Trump of everything they do, so when you accuse them of actually doing it, you look like the kid who says, "No, you're ugly" because the accusation is already associated with you.
There was a story about David Cameron being a pig-fucker. It was supposedly a dead pig and part of a hazing at university. There was a Black Mirror episode about it, a thinly disguised version of him.
There was a story about David Cameron being a pig-fucker. It was supposedly a dead pig and part of a hazing at university. There was a Black Mirror episode about it, a thinly disguised version of him.
It won't take much to see through this. This should be a good test to see how brainwashed and stupid and uncaring for the safety of their children the left and normies really are.
If you ever get into an argument over it, ask what the rate of homosexuality was in 1980, then ask how many gays by percentage there are now. It's an interesting counter to the idea that homosexuals are "born that way." They'll try and deflect and say they were all closeted before, but there's plenty of well-conducted medical studies that show otherwise due to the AIDS epidemic which brought a lot of attention to the gay community.
It's being promoted. Kids are listening. Kids are experimenting with it. Kids are adopting these identities, independent of biological drive. So are older people, men with kids.
The answer to "born that way" is that implies a genetic cause. Since gays rarely reproduce, if it was genetic, it should have been bred out of the population thousands of years ago. Simple logic.
Yes, there would be limited numbers of queers if it was solely genetic, but not anywhere near the numbers we see now. Most recessive traits, such as in eye color, hair color, height, etc. continue to exist widely because they don't affect life or reproduction. Being queer, if it were actually caused by a recessive gene, would be slower to propagate than blue eyes, for example, because the queers with the double recessive gene wouldn't be passing on their genes. On the other hand, someone with blue eyes is just as likely to have kids as someone with brown eyes.
Being queer is not genetic. It's a lifestyle choice.
Excellent point. Michael Savage always equated it to the "Do you still beat your wife?" Question. The accusation is there and the denial still leaves a bad taste.
It reminds me of how the left accused Trump of everything they do, so when you accuse them of actually doing it, you look like the kid who says, "No, you're ugly" because the accusation is already associated with you.
If "Yes", please proceed to the firing squad. If "No", please proceed to the gallows.
There was a story about David Cameron being a pig-fucker. It was supposedly a dead pig and part of a hazing at university. There was a Black Mirror episode about it, a thinly disguised version of him.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piggate
There was a story about David Cameron being a pig-fucker. It was supposedly a dead pig and part of a hazing at university. There was a Black Mirror episode about it, a thinly disguised version of him.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piggate
It won't take much to see through this. This should be a good test to see how brainwashed and stupid and uncaring for the safety of their children the left and normies really are.
You’re giving way too much credit, John
I know =(
If you ever get into an argument over it, ask what the rate of homosexuality was in 1980, then ask how many gays by percentage there are now. It's an interesting counter to the idea that homosexuals are "born that way." They'll try and deflect and say they were all closeted before, but there's plenty of well-conducted medical studies that show otherwise due to the AIDS epidemic which brought a lot of attention to the gay community.
It's being promoted. Kids are listening. Kids are experimenting with it. Kids are adopting these identities, independent of biological drive. So are older people, men with kids.
The answer to "born that way" is that implies a genetic cause. Since gays rarely reproduce, if it was genetic, it should have been bred out of the population thousands of years ago. Simple logic.
Allegedly the rate of homosexuality is about 3%
Coincidently the rate of birth defects is also about 3%
People have siblings. Additionaly, have you ever heard of a recessive trait?
Yes, there would be limited numbers of queers if it was solely genetic, but not anywhere near the numbers we see now. Most recessive traits, such as in eye color, hair color, height, etc. continue to exist widely because they don't affect life or reproduction. Being queer, if it were actually caused by a recessive gene, would be slower to propagate than blue eyes, for example, because the queers with the double recessive gene wouldn't be passing on their genes. On the other hand, someone with blue eyes is just as likely to have kids as someone with brown eyes.
Being queer is not genetic. It's a lifestyle choice.
Molested fags create molested fags, simple.