Every conspiracy personality going all the way back to Bill Cooper, Jordan Maxwell to Kerry Cassidy to Alex Jones, etc etc etc have always had beef with their contemporaries. Its how the white hats and black hats, y'know those wizards and warlocks that Q mentions, have always seeded out disclosure.
They'll provide insider sources to these conspiracy analysts and build up a relation of trust over time by providing 80% truth with say 20% disinfo mixed in. Now the analysts always end up trusting these sources over everyone else because they've seen the huge amount of disclosures provided to them that turned out to be true. Plus these sources let the analysts break the story and be at the forefront for much of it. The rub is that the wizards and warlocks purposely make that 20% of disinfo directly contradict all the other analyst's sources out there, and vice versa. Pretty standard operating procedure for op sec and plausible deniability.
Social media has sadly made this dick swinging contest even more tribal, with online onlookers blindly jumping head first off the cliff into a permanent "NO TRUE SCOTTSMAN" fallacy. This board can get caught up in it just as bad as reddit at times. It's a nasty side effect of the upvote/downvote system that really promotes the mob mentality and momentary idiocracy often without any room for nuance, only groupthink. Alex Jones aside, it's pretty sad when Q followers get so tribal when the team spent literally years explaining this concept of purposeful disinfo and double, triple, reverse uno actors. But how many people online were actually reading and studying those drops all throughout Trump's presidency? Most were busy updootin memes on the_donald, and then when the steal was solidified a small amount who couldn't cope finally opened their minds up long enough to jump on the bandwagon. And that's great I'm not here to gatekeep. we're all on our own timelines. But anyone on this board in particular claiming with certainty that they know who is, and who isn't a white/black hat doesn't have the slightest clue of the scope of the game they're now so devoutly following.
Except.................... Jones was around 3+ decades before Q ever made the first drop.
And when the accusation comes from Reuters, a dyed in the wool Deep State MSM source, well that speaks for itself.
Well I’d say the template is exactly what Stew Peters is following lol
This
He sounds fairly reasonable discussing most subjects. When he talks about Q he turns into a twelve year old that just got dumped by his girlfriend.
Totally transparent and ridiculous lies about Q and Q followers.
Every conspiracy personality going all the way back to Bill Cooper, Jordan Maxwell to Kerry Cassidy to Alex Jones, etc etc etc have always had beef with their contemporaries. Its how the white hats and black hats, y'know those wizards and warlocks that Q mentions, have always seeded out disclosure.
They'll provide insider sources to these conspiracy analysts and build up a relation of trust over time by providing 80% truth with say 20% disinfo mixed in. Now the analysts always end up trusting these sources over everyone else because they've seen the huge amount of disclosures provided to them that turned out to be true. Plus these sources let the analysts break the story and be at the forefront for much of it. The rub is that the wizards and warlocks purposely make that 20% of disinfo directly contradict all the other analyst's sources out there, and vice versa. Pretty standard operating procedure for op sec and plausible deniability.
Social media has sadly made this dick swinging contest even more tribal, with online onlookers blindly jumping head first off the cliff into a permanent "NO TRUE SCOTTSMAN" fallacy. This board can get caught up in it just as bad as reddit at times. It's a nasty side effect of the upvote/downvote system that really promotes the mob mentality and momentary idiocracy often without any room for nuance, only groupthink. Alex Jones aside, it's pretty sad when Q followers get so tribal when the team spent literally years explaining this concept of purposeful disinfo and double, triple, reverse uno actors. But how many people online were actually reading and studying those drops all throughout Trump's presidency? Most were busy updootin memes on the_donald, and then when the steal was solidified a small amount who couldn't cope finally opened their minds up long enough to jump on the bandwagon. And that's great I'm not here to gatekeep. we're all on our own timelines. But anyone on this board in particular claiming with certainty that they know who is, and who isn't a white/black hat doesn't have the slightest clue of the scope of the game they're now so devoutly following.
Like Alex more as time goes on. A showman? Yes. Worth watching? Yes.
A deep dark world is being exposed. The truth won't be for EVERYONE. Have faith in Humanity. Q
https://qalerts.app/?n=4915
He's been on the air more than 20 years. I think your theory is full of shit.
So why we don't sue all MSM for all the bs they spread every day?
Except.................... Jones was around 3+ decades before Q ever made the first drop. And when the accusation comes from Reuters, a dyed in the wool Deep State MSM source, well that speaks for itself.
Was there when TGA and CBTS got kicked off of Reddit. Went to Voat after that. Wasn't pretty.