Frazzledrip Fake?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (119)
sorted by:
Sigh. This was an anon on the board. It's wasn't Q.
"it is always said that there are no typos, but everything is comms"
Who always says that? It wasn't Q.
You've picked up banter and construed it to be some sort of fact. Can I suggest you read the actual Qdrops, and start from there, instead of banter and hearsay that travels along the Great Awakening grapevine?
Not to be too harsh, but it's NOT helpful when people ignore what Q has written and is all about, but somehow still pretend or imagine that they know what Q is about.
Apply due diligence, logic, empirical evidence, and discernment.
Q4535
Well pal, maybe the exact quote "it is always said that there are no typos, but everything is comms" was not said by Q
But Q talked about it several times .
https://qagg.news/?q=misspelling
Well pal, thanks, but Q talked about "misspellings" in the Q drops, indicating that they are not accidental (except when indicated; several times Q wrote a drop with a misspelling and quickly followed it up with a drop that said (paraphrase) "ignore that misspelling, I (we're) on the move" indicating that it was indeed a mistake in that case, because he (they) were using a device while moving.
In the OP, the "misspelling" is something an anon wrote, not what Q wrote, and Q never, ever, ever, never, wrote anything to imply that misspellings by anons are "comms".
See the point? the fren above heard something about Q, was not actually properly informed or misunderstood what he (she) had heard, and then went with the idea that somehow, a comment by an anon on the board was "comms" because intentional misspellings by Q are intentional. And this, pal, is just plain wrong.
Some of us actually have a vested interest in seeing that Q is properly and well understood.
Do you see? With Q, you cannot just invest a half effort or a glance and assume that you know what is going on. Some of us have invested hundreds and thousands of hours over the last 5 years to work with and understand and convey what Q actually is. It's a constant battle, because the Cabal and the Deep State are constantly attempting to confuse people and mislead the population as to what Q is, etc. But it's also a battle here, because as the number of anons grows, more and more newbies come in and just run with loose ideas that are not based on actual Q content or work.
We should all be making as much effort as possible to build up and promote solid, Q-based understanding of Q.
Have a great day, fren (pal).
k...you using all them words but STILL missed the point.....hahaha
Keep pontificating pal.....
Wow. Why are you here?
I don't know if it was a rant, but either way, sure, nothing wrong with arguments or making them (in the sense of arguments being assertions). But it's important to recognize that assertions are assertions, and not necessarily treat them as facts.
Perhaps my reply was harsh. Eye of the beholder, and all that.
But still, "it is always said that there are no(t) typos, but everything is comms" is a low effort statement. Who always says that?
That's not Q-content. That's pseudo-Q content. If that's harsh, then it's harsh. Failure to distinguish those is taking a heavy toll on this movement.