.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
.
Yes, communes are for a certain size and type of society.
Different rules apply to different scales, just as in physical science.
Single vision is another word for failure in some people's business recipe books, just sayin. It all depends on what this vision is, and it would remain to be seen why it only belongs to one person.
The reason one shouldn't hire 'yes men' to advise. And he ends up hiring outside advisors yet again. We've seen this. Because he and the board are 'us' and the workers 'them'.
The Great Reset is to both heads of the eagle. When will they join forces?
btw: Just before and after 9/11, professors, legal eagles and business heads were all shuttling back and forth to and from Munich in discussions of future 'intellectual property' and how it can be manipulated.....I mean viewed to benefit :)
It's like pitching snorkels to the Shark Tank as they circle around our 'lack of vision'. :)
Thanks for your comments
I'm using my own definition of "vision" which is simply something like "I wanna sell groceries."
When your co-owners decide they want to sell furniture, marijuana, open a restaurant, a movie theatre, refine uranium...
That's when your grocery store becomes a corporation and everyone begins to beg a King to come in and bring order to the chaos.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Samuel%208&version=GNV
10 ¶ So Samuel told all the words of the Lord unto the people that asked a king of him.
11 And he said, This shall be the [f]manner of the king that shall reign over you: he will take your sons, and appoint them to his chariots, and to be his horsemen, and some shall run before his chariot.
12 Also he will make them his captains over thousands, and captains over fifties, and to ear his ground, and to reap his harvest, and to make instruments of war, and the things that serve for his chariots.
13 He will also take your daughters and make them Apothecaries, and Cooks, and Bakers.
14 And he will take your fields, and your vineyards, and your best Olive trees, and give them to his servants.
15 And he will take the tenth of your seed, and of your vineyards, and give it to his [g]Eunuchs, and to his servants.
16 And he will take your menservants, and your maidservants, and the chief of your young men, and your asses, and put them to his work.
17 He will take the tenth of your sheep, and ye shall be his servants.
18 And ye shall cry out at that day, because of your king, whom ye have chosen you, and the Lord will not [h]hear you at that day.
19 But the people would not hear the voice of Samuel, but did say, Nay, but there shall be a king over us.
The people's needs were not unfounded -- they wanted clear direction because they were too scared to venture boldly and pursue their own dreams for fear of the failure that often follows.
The nature of man, then, is to want to "belong" to something which they can collaborate and find success and thereby prepare for the time they must set out alone in pursuit of their dreams.
To avoid the backlash of these situations, each organization must maintain a singular vision, but avoid stooping to elect a King which will oppress them to keep them from swaying from the "vision."
Eventually, the King's vision is no longer the vision of the people, and ruin follows.
God should be the only King, but we must still have leaders like Samuel; judges who determine which way the wind blows that we may follow it instead of toil against the tempest, doing battle with the elements.
Can the body exist without the brain? Yes, but it is what we call a vegetable.
Can the brain exist without the body? No, it will wither and die from exposure and so it will seek to immortalize itself with perverse and artificial means.
So what is the solution?
I believe that we must let the brain lead as a judge, taking in senses and distributing their meaning to the body. Should we ever stumble and appoint the brain as superior to the body, then we will succumb to the lures of stimulation -- lust, gluttony, greed, wrath, envy, pride, and sloth.
This will be because the brain, a thing designed to interpret stimulation, will begin to overindulge in stimulation simply because it is wont to do so -- it is what it is supposed to do. Given total authority, the brain will explore stimulation at the cost of letting the body break down.
The brain must serve the body and the body must serve the brain. Any unbalancing of this nature leads either to Kings which leads to Tyrants or Confusion which leads to Stagnancy.
Re: Should we ever stumble and appoint the brain as superior to the body, then we will succumb to the lures of stimulation -- lust, gluttony, greed, wrath, envy, pride, and sloth.
Brain, mind, psyche, nous, spirit
Where they go one, they go all. God is One
All action is preceded by thought. Pre-seeded
Some want to remove the head, to which I say please do, but I don't expect it.
Re:" The brain must serve the body and the body must serve the brain. Any unbalancing of this nature leads either to Kings which leads to Tyrants or Confusion which leads to Stagnancy."
I like the analogy and it shows the problem of dualism in this world, especially in the nature of power.
The cabal uses opposites, as a dichotomy in a Hegelian Dialectic, imitating balance as a teeter tottering to and fro.
'The Solution' is always the opposite of dissolution.
thanks for your reply
Be careful, that's the trap. It's not a duality.
It's a Trinity.
Some say it is better to fall left, other say to fall right.
They are blinded by the duality, and refuse to acknowledge the third state, which is to stand boldly as the forces of left and right pull upon you.
Standing is the balance, and the flavor of life comes in the small times where the right is more bold and the left is more bold, but we should never let the pendulum swing such that it breaks the clock's housing.
Evil is neither left nor right.
Evil is desiring the left to be right and the right to be left.
Though, not because the right is the opposite of left, but because when God wishes for things to be right Evil wishes only that God not see His Will come to fruition.
Evil is not the opposite of anything. It is the absence of God's Will. Whatever form the absence takes will be acting for Evil, but is not Evil. God did not make anything to be Evil, because God is not Evil.
There is no duality because Evil is not equal to God. Evil is the corruption of something to be anything other, including opposite, of what God intends. The act itself is Evil, not the subject matter.
Your genitals are not Evil. Misusing them is Evil. Adam and Eve covered their loins once they partook of the fruit because their newly-found judgement led them to assume all that was capable of Evil acts was itself Evil.
This is the deception that permeates all debate and discussion; things like assuming that because guns kill, and killing is Evil, that guns are Evil.
It's Tools versus Weapons, not Good versus Evil.
Good always wins, Evil always loses. There is no versus, and no duality. Just a misunderstanding of when and where a tool should be used such that it never becomes a weapon.
Sorry if I sound overbearing. I agree with your sentiment, but when I see someone fall into the same trap I once did, I cannot help but offer a guiding hand out.
. It isn't a trinity unless it's dissolved. That's why the need for the solution. The Solution is God is One. 'That art thou' in other systems as well. Taoism is a study in the knowledge of and attempted release from(?) dualism. Psychology speaks of dualism as the mind functions by it. In the material world, there is duality by perception, itself a triune function. I have entered into the highest level of conversation/discussion/discourse about cognition and cognitive behavior as it relates both socially and on the psyche.
I'm fairly adept at theology including comparitive theology to be completely honest, and so I accept all informative discourse about these things. Have I taught you anything by it? I hope so.
Careful whom you might presume to teach without knowing the depth of the host.
Thanks again for your opinion