Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I beg to differ, the first amendment also says free speech is absolute, yet even people on here won't complain about it being illegal to scream fire in a theatre or something similar. Things like satanism are evil and corrupt by nature. Are we just ignoring that not too long ago they sued over all of the abortion bans because it "violated their religious freedoms since their religion calls for human sacrifice"?
So, I'll throw that question right back at you. Should we allow EVERYONE to do whatever they want because of "freedom"? Should cultists be allowed to conduct human sacrifices to their pagan deities? What about muslims? Should we legalize child marriage because it's A-Ok in their "religion"?
I'm all for freedom, but everyone needs to stop being an absolutist on every topic. There ARE limits to what we perceive as freedom. Otherwise you have Sodom and Gomorrah, where everything goes and nothing is illegal.
Notice you didn't refute the rest, meaning my point still stands even if what you say is true, which is isn't since it's based on local laws most of the time.
Regardless my point still stands, there ARE limits to "freedom" unless you want to live in a nation where sharia law is legal, meaning muslims can behead you for being a non muslim, child marriage is legal, cultists can conduct human sacrifice, etc. etc.
Or would you rather all of that be fully legal because they "have the freedom to do so"?
You can't have it both ways.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
If the “religion” or “belief system” is in direct opposition to our Constitution it is NOT ALLOWED to be practiced here.
Islam is one of those belief systems along with those who worship Satan/self.
I beg to differ, the first amendment also says free speech is absolute, yet even people on here won't complain about it being illegal to scream fire in a theatre or something similar. Things like satanism are evil and corrupt by nature. Are we just ignoring that not too long ago they sued over all of the abortion bans because it "violated their religious freedoms since their religion calls for human sacrifice"?
So, I'll throw that question right back at you. Should we allow EVERYONE to do whatever they want because of "freedom"? Should cultists be allowed to conduct human sacrifices to their pagan deities? What about muslims? Should we legalize child marriage because it's A-Ok in their "religion"?
I'm all for freedom, but everyone needs to stop being an absolutist on every topic. There ARE limits to what we perceive as freedom. Otherwise you have Sodom and Gomorrah, where everything goes and nothing is illegal.
Please quit repeating this bullshit.
It is NOT illegal to yell fire in a movie theatre. Period.
Notice you didn't refute the rest, meaning my point still stands even if what you say is true, which is isn't since it's based on local laws most of the time.
Regardless my point still stands, there ARE limits to "freedom" unless you want to live in a nation where sharia law is legal, meaning muslims can behead you for being a non muslim, child marriage is legal, cultists can conduct human sacrifice, etc. etc.
Or would you rather all of that be fully legal because they "have the freedom to do so"?