.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
.
Let's call it performance based then, also known as meritocracy, you're against it?
IDk, it doesn't exist yet
How about a constantly rotating panel of (actual) experts? you can only serve for a couple of years in that position, then can only serve again after 10 years, would perhaps prevent bias and corruption
Whatever it is it must be contemplated, you can't avoid doing something out of fear of mistakes and obstacles, it must happen
Or do you really think people who:
Should be allowed to help decide the fate of a nation?
Maybe just really go back to the land-owner thing, it has it's set-backs, because one can just inherit land.... but at least it would be something.
... wow, are you ok? are you capable of thinking? are you capable of critical thinking?
THAT'S WHY I SUGGESTED AN ALTERNATIVE
Want to vote? sure, submit to the test, doesn't matter how rich you are, doesn't matter if you own land or not, you just have to prove you're not a complete fucking retard, how about that? because having complete fucking retards being allowed to vote is in great part what got us here.
I don't like the land-owner thing either, but it's BETTER than allowing anyone to vote, at least owning land suggests you or at least your parents had some capacity to earn enough money to accomplish that, and if you inherited it, at least there's a small fucking chance you have the genetics to not be a complete fucking retard.
Yeah, sure, then you deal with, you make it better, you learn from it, but it's gotta be tried, you can't have everyone be allowed to vote, period.