I don't think that anyone thinks it's as simple as "it was the water the whole time!" for everyone in all demographics. I think this shows that IF there were to be a concept of tampering with a water supply, say this was their future plot to enact Covid19 2.0 the real version. They got too many paranoid people now it would NEVER slip by accidentally (like it did with the "doctors" with the Vaccine - homebrew conspiracy theorists are the best source of underutilized testing and oversight)
I'd say the HIV component to the evidence is compelling.
I'd say the Resdemevir was compelling and would love to get follow ups and transparency
I'd say that the snake venom component is bullshit if you take it literally.
I'd say "snake venom" means in essence, "genetically modified bullshit that hurts me, possible contrived from non-bat source" as the main issue here. It's not like "extract venom, put it in the bottle, YES SCIENCE!" no they went overboard and wanted the EXACT processes and went about a way to cause harm in a very subtle undetected way that would mean hurting someone the more you investigated or looking somewhere no one should ever look.
I believe the snake venom can be taken literally in terms of venom peptides. If you research you will see that Big Pharma is experimenting with venomic structures and venom peptides in "therapies" (please note use of quotes) focused on the treatment of diseases such as stroke, cancer, pain and erectile dysfunction.
I don't think that anyone thinks it's as simple as "it was the water the whole time!" for everyone in all demographics. I think this shows that IF there were to be a concept of tampering with a water supply, say this was their future plot to enact Covid19 2.0 the real version. They got too many paranoid people now it would NEVER slip by accidentally (like it did with the "doctors" with the Vaccine - homebrew conspiracy theorists are the best source of underutilized testing and oversight)
I'd say the HIV component to the evidence is compelling. I'd say the Resdemevir was compelling and would love to get follow ups and transparency I'd say that the snake venom component is bullshit if you take it literally. I'd say "snake venom" means in essence, "genetically modified bullshit that hurts me, possible contrived from non-bat source" as the main issue here. It's not like "extract venom, put it in the bottle, YES SCIENCE!" no they went overboard and wanted the EXACT processes and went about a way to cause harm in a very subtle undetected way that would mean hurting someone the more you investigated or looking somewhere no one should ever look.
I believe the snake venom can be taken literally in terms of venom peptides. If you research you will see that Big Pharma is experimenting with venomic structures and venom peptides in "therapies" (please note use of quotes) focused on the treatment of diseases such as stroke, cancer, pain and erectile dysfunction.