In Q post #3620:
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-44107570
Publicly known?
Think non_public.
Access granted.
Q
The link in Q's post #3620, discusses a "serious" flaw found in secure email tech.
From the article: "Security expert Mikko Hypponen, at F-Secure, said his understanding was that the vulnerability could in theory be used to decrypt a cache of encrypted emails sent in the past, if an attacker had access to such data.
"This is bad because the people who use PGP use it for a reason. People don't use it for fun - people who use it have real secrets, like business secrets or confidential things."
So from the article and Q post, it is suggested that either this "flaw" was not "publicly" known which indicates that it was well known privately and some SOB's actually had the ability to access to decrypted messages and emails. Imagine that you can effectively unmask people completely through the private tech sector where there is hardly any government oversight?
Someone can help a smoothed brain Anon like me, but seems to me that nearly every email client has this email encryption protocol, and if SOBs were aware of the 'flaw' and were given access to decrypt messaging, then they can get all the info they need bypassing Congress, the FISA process, etc. To me, this seems like something the CIA would be involved in- which is why even the CIA had multi-million dollar contract to Amazon using their AWS servers. It's possible that the CIA, through Amazon, Facebook, Google, etc. were able to unmask people at any time and no one in Congress ever knew this was happening.
If Big Tech is involved in some very serious treasonous charges, how can you replace this corrupt social media system without disrupting the flow of communication and access to the public? You'll need to build a parallel social media system (I'll explain more below).
In Q post #2793, Q discusses social media, anti-narrative and misinformation:
...
Countermeasures in place.
[Example]
Think Emergency Alert System.
Think WH controlled new RT 'news' website
Think WH controlled new video stream platform
Think Here.
Should this occur, immediate steps will be taken to classify each as 'Public Utility' (essential public services) to gain appropriate gov regulation (control).
Why do we make things public?
Q
What's more interesting are the lines Q wrote:
Think WH controlled new RT 'news' website
Think WH controlled new video stream platform
Now many of us assumed "WH" = "White House" and you'd be correct. However, there are double meanings that do exist, according to Q. What if "WH" didn't mean "White House", but rather, 'White Hat'. Then think about TMTG and how a company like TruthSocial and various TMTG products could actually be classified as a 'Public Utility' to gain appropriate gov regulation (control)? So imagine that the company Trump is creating can be fully utilized by the government (white hat / military) in a state of crisis. Trump would 100% allow this to happen. Even in these two Q lines, Q mentions 'NEWS' website AND 'VIDEO STREAMING'. What other products is TMTG+ going to be doing? You guessed it, NEWS and VIDEO STREAMING.
Now all of that may bake your noodle, BUT think about how Starlink via SpaceX plays right into this. SpaceX, which has many government contracts, can be contracted during this time to provide internet access to the government. Remember, Q said NSA has the ability to overreach the host in the event of a 'net shutdown'. Meaning, that the White Hat government (military cont. gov) can bypass the current internet host and effectively connect it with StarLink to give people access if the 'net' is actually taken offline, or running continual communications for the White Hat operations. This is also why Rumble servers are being built away from Amazon, Microsoft, etc. for the exact same reason and purpose.
Literally the White Hats are creating a parallel social media system that will have the ability to use Starlink capabilities to communicate with everyone... no matter what Big Tech decides to do.
Part of me thinks THIS is the actual reason for TruthSocial, TMTG+, Rumble, etc. in the short term. Long term is to combat the fake news and 'woke' media.
If the big tech swamp companies take down the internet to prevent people from discovering the Truth, then so be it..
there is no secure anything
All you can ever do is hedge against it. This is why centralization requirements are inherently anti-humanitarian. Your data required to be online inherently puts you at risk and kills your privacy - no matter how secure it’s purported to be.
my job had to leave php for SMIME
Bare with me. I am in mobile. We had to abandon PGP because of these flaws. SMIME is a Use Case where a key also requires a typical full stack OpenSSL based certificate exchange. It’s basically the same concepts for SSL websites applied to email. Each email address has an SSL that gets formally signed and keyed. It’s a bit better and can be better managed within an organization. Again the problem with these is key exchange. This inherent security issue ( key exchange ) is going to grow and grow because lamen people have no concept of it.
Yes. I can walk you through how flaws like this are _intentionally introduced into code by Intel Agencies. Example is the Heartbleed OpenSSL exploit.
You are at the gates of the Big Picture. It’s also involving Space Force ( which is why Podesta etc are trying so hard to create an agency to oppose Space Force under the guise of UFOs being Unidentified Aerial Threats ). Networks work in segments. The idea is that a orbital network can and will be a guard / hedge. Space Force is a way to build out new networks and entrench. StarLink is the same. The guise here is that there are Space Treaties that forbid militarization - that’s why a private company can get away with things a government can’t in regards to space.
Again - Think Bigger. Gone are the days of the Free and Open Internet ( RE: John Perry Barlow ). The next model is already here and it’s a series of “Cloud Networks” that operate nested within other networks or not and can peer. The concept is called Federation. This ties into the coming Global BioMedical Control Grid. They want you to have an internet entry point they can require a Federal ID on. StarLink etc possibly will give you use and access outside of that.
@OP you have your head on right.
Watch https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/the-secrets-of-silicon-valley-what-big:8 and then DM me.
I would like to continue discussion - some may not need to be here.
Basically if you want to be private - learn your shit.
Also - remember that once you are identified they can pair metadata from past use. What I mean is that say you post on 8kun “Anonymously”. If they can pair up your post through linguistics or anything else - they can match that up against anything you have ever done on the internet with increasing accuracy - reaching back through time. That’s why it’s all archived. That’s why the EU is pushing to do the same.
We are on borrowed time. Make use of it.
https://rambox.app
EDIT:
Remember - Truth Social also just fell back to using the Content Delivery Network of Rumble ( Rumble Cloud ) was the name being thrown around.
If that doesn’t back your point - nothing does.
Another fantastic comment from y000danon.
Thank you for the truth, which I’ve always suspected regarding email and the internet in general. Regarding the medical system, my own experience as a psychotherapist:
I not do insurance billing online, I do not email with patients, (or text except for appointments) I tell patients that insurance billing will impact confidentiality, I recently made the decision to stop billing insurance at all, and do sliding scale fee.
I’ve noticed over the past few years: Every health insurance company is moving toward requiring providers to bill them online, (if you mail in a paper bill, it takes 6 -8 weeks to get paid, and recently they are not sending checks, but sending Paper credit card payments, which require entering in to a credit card processor.) it’s harder and harder to get someone on the phone to discuss billing status. Thus my decision to stop billing insurance.
Health insurance companies are all consolidating their billing and payments through third party systems, and those companies require therapists to log in to their website to get any information on eligibility, claims status, etc. I can tell you it would not be hard to hack into this system to get info on any patient, all you need it their birthdate and their insurance card number.
They are making it easy for providers by providing them with software that you can use to enter clinical notes, update patient status, etc, make billing and payments streamlined and easy.
The key of any therapeutic relationship is confidentiality and privacy, and therapists are trained to guard that confidentiality with the utmost care. Now, with online zoom therapy and Covid stuff, many therapists are signing up to be providers for companies who refer them patients, do the billing, and make payments. They have online therapy systems that are “certified” to be “encrypted and confidential.” Most therapists are not tech savvy, anything that makes the referral and billing easier, they sign right up.
They have NO CLUE that the patient or ANYONE can record these “confidential” online sessions. I anticipate lawsuits in the future.
From early on, I knew that phone sessions, online therapy, insurance billing would be a bad idea. I knew I needed a computer at my office that has no connection to the internet. Many people cannot afford therapy without using their insurance, and they are willing to believe the insurance company keeps things confidential.
Recently, that myth was shattered for one of my patients. She had a diagnosis of depression and had many other issues. One day, she learned that her LIFE INSURANCE premium was increasing, because of her depression diagnosis…. No way they would have been able to get that diagnosis except from the HEALTH INSURANCE company. Now, of course, it’s illegal, unethical, for a health insurance company to share medical information with another company.
Sooooo, sorry for the long story, but people need to know that if they are telling their personal stories to a therapist online, or having their fees paid through insurance, there is no confidentiality to be trusted.
Another note, so many psychotherapists, doctors, psychiatrists, and counselors decided to go to online sessions during Covid, and many are still doing that. There are upsides to this, and frankly, I’m not concerned about people hearing me tell my doctor I have a cold or something. But I simply do not understand how people can not be concerned about privacy when talking to a therapist.
The upshot is… all these systems of big pharma, bit medical, big insurance, etc, are designed to maximize profit, and maximize control.
Good news, many of my new patients over the past two years called specifically looking for someone who does in-office therapy. That means many people are realizing the value of face to face connections, and the Covid distancing nightmare is well on its way to being over.
Excellent reply. Thank you for all that detail too!
%100. My entire company split United over their data handling. Was super bad.
I can’t imagine making real progress in remote sessions. I need physical communication and a sense of honesty to even speak freely. This remote stuff isn’t for me.
❤️