In Q post #3620:
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-44107570
Publicly known?
Think non_public.
Access granted.
Q
The link in Q's post #3620, discusses a "serious" flaw found in secure email tech.
From the article: "Security expert Mikko Hypponen, at F-Secure, said his understanding was that the vulnerability could in theory be used to decrypt a cache of encrypted emails sent in the past, if an attacker had access to such data.
"This is bad because the people who use PGP use it for a reason. People don't use it for fun - people who use it have real secrets, like business secrets or confidential things."
So from the article and Q post, it is suggested that either this "flaw" was not "publicly" known which indicates that it was well known privately and some SOB's actually had the ability to access to decrypted messages and emails. Imagine that you can effectively unmask people completely through the private tech sector where there is hardly any government oversight?
Someone can help a smoothed brain Anon like me, but seems to me that nearly every email client has this email encryption protocol, and if SOBs were aware of the 'flaw' and were given access to decrypt messaging, then they can get all the info they need bypassing Congress, the FISA process, etc. To me, this seems like something the CIA would be involved in- which is why even the CIA had multi-million dollar contract to Amazon using their AWS servers. It's possible that the CIA, through Amazon, Facebook, Google, etc. were able to unmask people at any time and no one in Congress ever knew this was happening.
If Big Tech is involved in some very serious treasonous charges, how can you replace this corrupt social media system without disrupting the flow of communication and access to the public? You'll need to build a parallel social media system (I'll explain more below).
In Q post #2793, Q discusses social media, anti-narrative and misinformation:
...
Countermeasures in place.
[Example]
Think Emergency Alert System.
Think WH controlled new RT 'news' website
Think WH controlled new video stream platform
Think Here.
Should this occur, immediate steps will be taken to classify each as 'Public Utility' (essential public services) to gain appropriate gov regulation (control).
Why do we make things public?
Q
What's more interesting are the lines Q wrote:
Think WH controlled new RT 'news' website
Think WH controlled new video stream platform
Now many of us assumed "WH" = "White House" and you'd be correct. However, there are double meanings that do exist, according to Q. What if "WH" didn't mean "White House", but rather, 'White Hat'. Then think about TMTG and how a company like TruthSocial and various TMTG products could actually be classified as a 'Public Utility' to gain appropriate gov regulation (control)? So imagine that the company Trump is creating can be fully utilized by the government (white hat / military) in a state of crisis. Trump would 100% allow this to happen. Even in these two Q lines, Q mentions 'NEWS' website AND 'VIDEO STREAMING'. What other products is TMTG+ going to be doing? You guessed it, NEWS and VIDEO STREAMING.
Now all of that may bake your noodle, BUT think about how Starlink via SpaceX plays right into this. SpaceX, which has many government contracts, can be contracted during this time to provide internet access to the government. Remember, Q said NSA has the ability to overreach the host in the event of a 'net shutdown'. Meaning, that the White Hat government (military cont. gov) can bypass the current internet host and effectively connect it with StarLink to give people access if the 'net' is actually taken offline, or running continual communications for the White Hat operations. This is also why Rumble servers are being built away from Amazon, Microsoft, etc. for the exact same reason and purpose.
Literally the White Hats are creating a parallel social media system that will have the ability to use Starlink capabilities to communicate with everyone... no matter what Big Tech decides to do.
Part of me thinks THIS is the actual reason for TruthSocial, TMTG+, Rumble, etc. in the short term. Long term is to combat the fake news and 'woke' media.
If the big tech swamp companies take down the internet to prevent people from discovering the Truth, then so be it..
This is why I say… don’t be shocked if Trump isn’t back in in 2024. A second stolen presidential election could be a massive redpill for non-commies. But this time we’ll have the social media we need to prosecute treason.
I will admit. It may be possible Trump propels someone else in his stead. Kinda like how John the Baptist “prepared the way”.
My concerns are:
Some of these suck and may have been delayed or done for good reasons. Just some things that are personally hard to swallow.
Agree with all of this. I'm a millie who wants to know and has been waiting on his promise to declas jfk. From my readings, that was the beginning of the end.
My understanding is he was legit in the Oval Office about to do it when Gina Haspal showed up w the DECLAS materials. Trump told Napalitano that when he saw what was in there he had to stop it and pivot being it would “bring everything crumbling down” or something along those lines.
Will find links