Only if the originally created purpose contains that intent. If so, then certainly.

In regards to copyright law, yes. In general use, no.

Don't you think that's a good thing?

I think words alone are not harmful. In public spaces, all words are acceptable. This is a public space, so all words should be allowed in my opinion. Even the ones I do not like.

Is deceiving someone in order to manipulate them is OK?

Deceit is not good. Intolerance for speech is also not good. The point I was making is that intolerance for speech is not made any better by being honest about it.

Is disagreeing with someone's opinion intolerance?

No.

To say, "I do not want you in my house to discuss your view of the benefits of pedophilia", is this intolerance?

Yes it is intolerance.

So, I guess you are promoting the idea that Christian schools founded on Christian ethics are hypocrites if they do not want teachers in their school who teach that there are 120+ genders and that men can be pregnant?

That is intolerance, but not hypocrisy.

people are free to create forums for discussing specific ideas and concepts, and not for discussing others.

Yes, people are free to do that. Making fun of people who are intolerant of certain words on said forum is still hypocrisy, though.

Are you OK with someone coming into your home and seducing your wife (or husband) and educating your kids in debauchery?

I would assume there is no consent in this hypothetical scenario, so the answer would be no.

I would like to clarify something. I do not have an issue with intolerance. I am intolerant of many things. I dread the idea of my child being tainted by these crazy ideologies people have going on. However crazy I may find them, they have the right to say whatever they want. My issue is with hypocrisy.