I'm pretty sure that the people that have banned were banned for far more than you are stating. It sounds convincing, but without the details of who was banned and why, I find your statement suspect. The people that I have flagged (very very few, maybe one or two) were way outta bounds and were obviously here to disrupt the nature of the discussions here.

OK. I'm gonna explain this again.

You are using a false.

Purpose is the core of every existence. Without purpose, nothing can exist. Who defines purpose? The creator. I create a watch, I define its purpose.

GAW has a purpose. That purpose is to provide a venue for the discussion and support of the Q work, which includes supporting and discussing DJT. The purpose is NOT to debate whether Q is good or bad, or whether DJT is good or bad. There are venues created for that purpose, and it's fine to use them for that purpose. People are free to choose.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

What part of this do you not understand? If your purpose or intent here is NOT pro-Q, you are violating the very purpose of this community. At a minimum, you can be neutral, asking questions, in order to try to find out and reach your own conclusions. But if someone is acting directly in contradiction to the purpose of the forum, then they are actually helping to destroy the forum, and erase its purpose.

Pedophiles abuse the purpose of childhood, rapists violate the purpose of sex, thieves violate the purpose of personal possession. Sodomites violate the purpose of the anus.

If someone wants to violate the purpose of this forum, should he or she be welcomed? Embraced? Tolerated?

In fact, that is the logic that the cultural marxists of the Frankfurt School promoted and advanced in our society. Their view is that all views that oppose the cultural marxist revolution must not be tolerated, and any that promote it must. Thus, LGBTQI views must be tolerated, but Christian views must not. THe real problem is, that for decades now, institutions, governments, and corporations have been adopting this perspective, but NOT being open about it. They only say the first part, they do not say the second part, and they hide their real purpose.

Twitter lied. They purported themselves to be a non-biased, open forum whose purpose is public discourse without prejudice. If they had promoted Twitter like this: "We will shut down accounts that talk about topics we do not like, that do not support Globalism, Cultural Marxism or Leftism." how many people would have joined? None. Ergo, they were deceptive. Their real purpose was not the purpose they offered to people.

There is a critical difference between "Free Speech" which means primarily that government does NOT impose restrictions on the free speech of citizens, and Private Purpose.

Any company, organization or group has the right to define their own purpose as long as it is lawful. People are not free to violate the purpose of something they themselves did not create or own.

Not going to blast you, but GAW (and Patriots) are a direct response to not being allowed to post on the so-called "non-biased" sites.

When you are removed from these so-called "free speech" platforms, you create platforms and disallow the trolls from the platforms you were removed from.

These communities have clear rules that don't pretend to be non-biased and also are not to the same level of digital town square that Twitter has become.