Be careful. You have just condemned your own claims to be meaningless.
Proof of what? That I exist? You want information that is against the law to request? Big puffery from a guy that can't provide any credentials, even to simply relate them. I trust you to tell the truth...you are just confused about the science.
You don't want me to respond? Then don't feed the bear...
You don't understand logic either? A proof of what you claim requires extraordinary evidence. Have you noticed its unheard of to publish credentials without including academic title and surname? Doing so anonymously is a meaningless exercise. Not once would I dare travel that road.... and you have no idea who I am. I prefer keeping it that way too. We are all equal here.
I am only stating there are contrails, for which there is plenty of evidence. You are the one making the unsubstantiated and vague claim of the widespread existence of so-called "chemtrails." Cough up your evidence that they exist. Documentation of speculation is not evidence of existence. Accusation of a widespread conspiracy requires material evidence of equipment, planning, and airborne dispersion.
I am citing my basis for expressing an informed view, which consists of specialized education and experience pertinent to the subject. You want degrees? I have three degrees in aeronautics and astronautics, specializing in fluid mechanics and applied physics. I was in my Company's Technical Fellowship. I have 9 patents (go look up no. 8,800,933 B2 to learn my surname).
So---you do the same...if you can. So far, you are a nobody to me. A nobody who is more wrapped up in a dominance challenge than in explaining anything.
" I have three degrees in aeronautics and astronautics, specializing in fluid mechanics and applied physics."
Circular argument. It's deja vu all over again. Extraordinary 'claims' demands extraordinary evidence. You fail at the extraordinary evidence part. BS. Go away.
The only extraordinary claim is for "chemtrails." And the extraordinary evidence bit is pure showmanship. If something is true, all it takes is evidence (but not speculation). By your response, you invite me.
Be careful. You have just condemned your own claims to be meaningless.
Proof of what? That I exist? You want information that is against the law to request? Big puffery from a guy that can't provide any credentials, even to simply relate them. I trust you to tell the truth...you are just confused about the science.
You don't want me to respond? Then don't feed the bear...
You don't understand logic either? A proof of what you claim requires extraordinary evidence. Have you noticed its unheard of to publish credentials without including academic title and surname? Doing so anonymously is a meaningless exercise. Not once would I dare travel that road.... and you have no idea who I am. I prefer keeping it that way too. We are all equal here.
I am only stating there are contrails, for which there is plenty of evidence. You are the one making the unsubstantiated and vague claim of the widespread existence of so-called "chemtrails." Cough up your evidence that they exist. Documentation of speculation is not evidence of existence. Accusation of a widespread conspiracy requires material evidence of equipment, planning, and airborne dispersion.
I am citing my basis for expressing an informed view, which consists of specialized education and experience pertinent to the subject. You want degrees? I have three degrees in aeronautics and astronautics, specializing in fluid mechanics and applied physics. I was in my Company's Technical Fellowship. I have 9 patents (go look up no. 8,800,933 B2 to learn my surname).
So---you do the same...if you can. So far, you are a nobody to me. A nobody who is more wrapped up in a dominance challenge than in explaining anything.
Circular argument. It's deja vu all over again. Extraordinary 'claims' demands extraordinary evidence. You fail at the extraordinary evidence part. BS. Go away.
The only extraordinary claim is for "chemtrails." And the extraordinary evidence bit is pure showmanship. If something is true, all it takes is evidence (but not speculation). By your response, you invite me.