Late summer 2018 If I recall correctly. Someone who called themselves VIP Anon posted about getting a backstage pass to see President Trump. Long story short, He received a photo of himself and Trump at that meeting and on the back it was signed (((+))).
Late summer 2018 If I recall correctly. Someone who called themselves VIP Anon posted about getting a backstage pass to see President Trump. Long story short, He received a photo of himself and Trump at that meeting and on the back it was signed (((+)))
Or in other words, some dude on the internet claimed himself to be a "VIP" anon, got a picture of Trump, and alleged that he witnessed Trump do something totally bizarre, and unprecedented with his (alleged) picture by drawing (((+))) on the back, and insisted the drawing was a "signature" for the president of the USA.
And then, people on the internet somehow deduced that an alleged presidential drawing of (((+))) on the back of a picture is the same thing as a signature on a Q post that looks like Q+ thus, verifying that the president of the USA was indeed typing mysterious messages to the public on 8chan forums.
This kind of reasoning is called "mental gymnastics," not proof. But people are welcome to believe whatever they want, and in this case, they may even be correct. But I'm gonna shoot this straight, and say that Q+ is not a super secret coded signature for Donald Trump.
True. I recall seeing the evidence supporting the notion that Q+ is DJT, and it is always flimsy, subjective, and stretched beyond reason. I simply do not buy into that theory. Nor do I care much about who, or what Q+ actually is, because I have no interest in trying to doxx Q.
No, the photo was of VIP Anon AND Trump backstage at one of his rallies. He showed the VIP backstage pass and then videoed himself opening the package containing said photo, showing it had not been opened, official postmark and address from the Whitehouse etc.
What you say could be true. How do you know? You are just some dude on the internet who believes otherwise and therefore you should be believed? You have done no research to the contrary, you only disbelieve... because.
...because of the obvious: A drawing of "(((+)))" is not the same thing as a digital signature of "Q+" It is a stretch to assume that those two images are directly related, (oh my god, they both show a + symbol!) proof of the extraordinary claim that it means Donald J. Trump, president of the USA, is Q+, and posts cryptic messages on a chan forum. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs.
Late summer 2018 If I recall correctly. Someone who called themselves VIP Anon posted about getting a backstage pass to see President Trump. Long story short, He received a photo of himself and Trump at that meeting and on the back it was signed (((+))).
Or in other words, some dude on the internet claimed himself to be a "VIP" anon, got a picture of Trump, and alleged that he witnessed Trump do something totally bizarre, and unprecedented with his (alleged) picture by drawing (((+))) on the back, and insisted the drawing was a "signature" for the president of the USA.
And then, people on the internet somehow deduced that an alleged presidential drawing of (((+))) on the back of a picture is the same thing as a signature on a Q post that looks like Q+ thus, verifying that the president of the USA was indeed typing mysterious messages to the public on 8chan forums.
This kind of reasoning is called "mental gymnastics," not proof. But people are welcome to believe whatever they want, and in this case, they may even be correct. But I'm gonna shoot this straight, and say that Q+ is not a super secret coded signature for Donald Trump.
I would do some research, and find the coincidences surrounding Trump and Q+.
Nothing we say is going to convince you, you have to find what's evident to you.
True. I recall seeing the evidence supporting the notion that Q+ is DJT, and it is always flimsy, subjective, and stretched beyond reason. I simply do not buy into that theory. Nor do I care much about who, or what Q+ actually is, because I have no interest in trying to doxx Q.
I think it's strange that you have no interest in figuring it out, but you have interest in dissuading others.
You have the biggest comments in this thread over it.
I'm not here to figure you out, but this contradiction sticks out like a sore thumb to me.
I get where you are TRYING to come from but you are leaving out key elements of the story........you may want to review the VIP anon situation.
No, the photo was of VIP Anon AND Trump backstage at one of his rallies. He showed the VIP backstage pass and then videoed himself opening the package containing said photo, showing it had not been opened, official postmark and address from the Whitehouse etc.
What you say could be true. How do you know? You are just some dude on the internet who believes otherwise and therefore you should be believed? You have done no research to the contrary, you only disbelieve... because.
...because of the obvious: A drawing of "(((+)))" is not the same thing as a digital signature of "Q+" It is a stretch to assume that those two images are directly related, (oh my god, they both show a + symbol!) proof of the extraordinary claim that it means Donald J. Trump, president of the USA, is Q+, and posts cryptic messages on a chan forum. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs.
So, you have not researched this yourself.