“Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito writes. The entire draft opinion can be read below:
(www.scribd.com)
🏆 WINS OF THE DAY 🏆
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (243)
sorted by:
No, it's not up to the people to collectively do as such... this country is NOT a democracy. Please take that neocon collectivist shit elsewhere. The USA is a constitutional republic founded on the rule of law. Said law protects the rights of the unborn persons whose only "crime" is their mere existence.
Capital punishment has nothing to do with this argument. Murderers are criminals. Unborn children are not. Stay on topic.
The federal government must enforce the law (including Public Law 108-212) and the Constitution, no matter whatever states might wish to disregard said law and Constitution.
Where in the constitution does it say that criminality suspends the right to life? His argument is directly related, if not more paramount, considering the conscious nature of the person being murdered.
A murderer suspends his right to life when he takes someone else's life as in accordance with natural law. It's that fucking simple.
And it’s your job to claim that their life then needs to end? How is that not murder? Why does that deliberate action not equal murder?
The law already prescribes punishment for convicted murderers. You're just being a disingenuous twat.
A child in the womb cannot commit a murder, unlike an adult outside of the womb. A murderer commits a crime. An unborn child has committed no crime. Comparison is logically fallacious.
But to answer your "where in the Constitution" question, as if any crayon eating retard shouldn't already comprehend basic natural law....
"[no person shall] be deprived of LIFE, liberty, or property, without due process of law."
If due process IS followed, a person duly convicted of a crime CAN be deprived of property (fine), liberty (prison) or life (execution) as punishment.
Get out shill.