2,000 Mules was a huge head-fake?! - The Great Awakening

2,000 Mules was a huge head-fake?! ✅ - hmnmmm - ✅

posted 2 years ago by winn 2 years ago by winn +308 / -2

After reading this post https://greatawakening.win/p/15Hc8H94t6/saw-2000-mules-premier-with-a-do/ it dawned on me that 2,000 Mules was BAIT, and lookie what we caught! A SCOTUS leak about Roe v Wade. I'm still gonna watch the movie but damn this is top kek. That play the cabal made right there was very costly I believe

edit- this could lead to the exposure of corruption within SCOTUS, something the cabal DO NOT WANT. It would be very disarming for them

edit2- IF white hats were responsible for this leak, my theory is kind of out the window. I don't see them doing this but who knows

edit3! - Military is the only way? - Devin Nunes on TruthSocial: "With this leak, the Supreme Court has been completely compromised." - https://truthsocial.com/users/DevinNunes/statuses/108235626470891452

4 - @JuliansRum "Don’t rule out the possibility that this was an illegal surveillance operation instead of a leak."

127 comments

127 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (127)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– Tewdryg 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

The SCOTUS ruling is a draft ruling. My question is -- will it remain an unpublished draft and disappear in the memory hole? Is a draft ruling ever for public consumption? I believe it is not and for internal purposes only. Is the leak a trial balloon to gauge the reaction of the public? If there is widespread rioting and protest will SCOTUS remain silent until up the midterms, then publish the ruling?

I'm questioning why SCOTUS considered this in the first place. Why now? They could have tabled this 'draft' ruling until after the mid-terms.

permalink save report block reply