"MUSK. You magnificent bastard, Q read your BOOK!"...
Do you believe in coincidence? ...
H/t Evans baked...
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Remember that the Enemy was aware of 'Q' before 'we' were.
This is flimsy and does not resonate with what we have seen from Musk, yet disinfo is a Thang in this war. I embrace an 'ok, but verifyverifyverify' attitude with Musk, he has been all over the map, maybe he just 'keeps 'em guessing'.
Before "we" were.
We == You.
Fyi As Q said repeatedly, "future proves past" or as President Trump always says, "lets see what happens".
Evocative posts, tweets, news are intended to inspire curiousity, research and guesses. When guesses and research is shared, this inspires more curiousity, research and guesses.
This increases the chances of staying tuned to " see what happens" so you learn, in the "future " which guess "proves" to be right.
As Q warned, problems occur if guesses are asserted as proven facts without need of a future proof. Obviously NOT an issue with OPs post or the discussion it inspired.
I would add another, deadly, problem that's well known to anyone familiar with "brainstorming" sessions. The kill joy. The person who demands proof during a session that needs to be creatively free from lecturers, censors and shamers.
Ok, me and you, yeah. Exactly as I posted huh.
'You' may have learned 5 years ago, as I did, but the Enemy knew before that.