Calling a haughty spade a haughty spade now equates to leftism? I think I'm over target. The thing is that, instead of inquiring about why I would think so, you simply settled for insults. My fren, there are so many things wrong with your religion, it's doctrine and it's practice that I'm willing to bet you're unaware.
It's usually the ones who boast of their knowledge that are the ones confounded, in ignorance.
I don't belong to a religion, nice try though. Baffling that someone could point out your crap without being one of these mythical religious fanatics you prattle on about, no? Further, now you're dipping deeply into extreme hubris and ego. You purport to know exactly what my religion is, what its doctrine and practices are, and that I'm unaware of all these "belief-shattering" truths that you're aware of. That only your conclusion is reasonable and that you know something I don't about my own purported religion. All of that, you know based on me typing 7 words. 7 words that in no way explained what my beliefs are or anything of the sort that would give you the required information to make such claims about what I think. Truly, your ignorance is staggering. As is your arrogance and pompous self-importance.
There's no reason to inquire about any of your claims or beliefs and why you think them. They're very clearly steeped in ignorance as well as all the other attributes I've pointed out. Nothing worth learning there.
So all the things I said of your comment are true. And I never equated your comment to leftism, only a couple of traits (really only the projection aspect, which they love to do. There's nothing leftist about irony, on the other hand) that they happen to also possess yet are themselves distinct and don't only apply to leftists. If I wanted to accuse your comment of being leftist in nature I would have said that. I didn't want to accuse you of such hence why I didn't. But you pointing it out of your own accord speaks volumes to how you perceive your own comment.
The irony. The projection. It's so potent.
Calling a haughty spade a haughty spade now equates to leftism? I think I'm over target. The thing is that, instead of inquiring about why I would think so, you simply settled for insults. My fren, there are so many things wrong with your religion, it's doctrine and it's practice that I'm willing to bet you're unaware.
It's usually the ones who boast of their knowledge that are the ones confounded, in ignorance.
I don't belong to a religion, nice try though. Baffling that someone could point out your crap without being one of these mythical religious fanatics you prattle on about, no? Further, now you're dipping deeply into extreme hubris and ego. You purport to know exactly what my religion is, what its doctrine and practices are, and that I'm unaware of all these "belief-shattering" truths that you're aware of. That only your conclusion is reasonable and that you know something I don't about my own purported religion. All of that, you know based on me typing 7 words. 7 words that in no way explained what my beliefs are or anything of the sort that would give you the required information to make such claims about what I think. Truly, your ignorance is staggering. As is your arrogance and pompous self-importance.
There's no reason to inquire about any of your claims or beliefs and why you think them. They're very clearly steeped in ignorance as well as all the other attributes I've pointed out. Nothing worth learning there.
So all the things I said of your comment are true. And I never equated your comment to leftism, only a couple of traits (really only the projection aspect, which they love to do. There's nothing leftist about irony, on the other hand) that they happen to also possess yet are themselves distinct and don't only apply to leftists. If I wanted to accuse your comment of being leftist in nature I would have said that. I didn't want to accuse you of such hence why I didn't. But you pointing it out of your own accord speaks volumes to how you perceive your own comment.