Uranium 1 deal was to sell nuclear material to Russia. HRC takes some off the top. A nuke goes off somewhere and it's traced back to the Uranium 1 deal because that material was sold to Russia, but the bomb was made with the material Hillary skimmed off the top. Now the world goes after Russia.
The way I read it, Mr. Stone is warning of a FF perpetrated by any unknown party being the catalyst for WW3.
It doesn't matter in the slightest who /what or where the material actually comes from. When/if that ever gets surfaced, it would be a Iraqi WMD situation all over again, only millions(b?) could have already died.
Yes, but what he's saying ties into what we already know about HRC and U1. The original comment stated when they see "nuclear" they stop reading. That's not the right approach when this is just the 1.2 version of what HRC was going to do.
I'm a simple man. I read nuclear and I walk away.
Thats the wrong way to look at it.
Uranium 1 deal was to sell nuclear material to Russia. HRC takes some off the top. A nuke goes off somewhere and it's traced back to the Uranium 1 deal because that material was sold to Russia, but the bomb was made with the material Hillary skimmed off the top. Now the world goes after Russia.
The same thing is in play here.
The way I read it, Mr. Stone is warning of a FF perpetrated by any unknown party being the catalyst for WW3. It doesn't matter in the slightest who /what or where the material actually comes from. When/if that ever gets surfaced, it would be a Iraqi WMD situation all over again, only millions(b?) could have already died.
Yes, but what he's saying ties into what we already know about HRC and U1. The original comment stated when they see "nuclear" they stop reading. That's not the right approach when this is just the 1.2 version of what HRC was going to do.
Those were the bombs they planned for us. I heard their ability to use them is neutralized.
There would have to be come proof Russia didn't do it already to be presentednv