This.👇🏻
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (163)
sorted by:
I agree wholeheartedly, this is why being a rapist is general is such an aggravating factor, because of what you've laid out. If there are complications in the pregnancy you simply do your best to save both the mother and child, if the child dies as an unintended consequence of the intervention then so be it.
In the context of what we're discussing that's a very, very dangerous thing to say when you take it to it's logical conclusions. The commons surplus exists to serve human life, else what is it there for exactly?
You need rape related pregnancy divorced from common-law or married couples as a generalised rate over the population per annum, it's going to be a tiny figure, just buy one less F35 that year, or give one less billion to Ukraine, it's not a money issue, and even if it were, a society that does not defend the utterly helpless against arbitrary murder is not one worth saving anyway.
Lastly...
No, the rapist forced that circumstance upon the woman, and he is lawfully executed for it, the status quo now is carrying the child, the "DO"ing part is over. The state merely says "Do not kill children". It is not an active "DO" on the state's part, it is a DO NOT.
The mother being forced by the rapist into being an unwilling landlord to an unwanted tenant is of course, horrific, execute the rapist, carrying the child can be whatever adjective you desire it to be, the noun "murder" beats it.
As it stands there is no lawful execution for rapists. Many instances rapists aren’t caught. It seems there is currently more resources being used to first punish the woman than the rapist. Putting the cart before the horse, so to speak.
I sincerely hope none of your loved ones have to go through this ordeal, being impregnated through rape. But if one does, I hope you can realize better their perspective.
Take care.
I would donate to a PAC advocating for blanket execution for rapists with DNA evidence etc or evidence to that effect. My position would absolutely not change if it were my sister carrying the child, the child is innocent, it did nothing wrong, just like it's mother.
You too.
I'm glad that you would do that, but that doesn't exist now. As it stands, the movement currently sets out to punish the victim before we make more strides to punish the rapist.
If the carrier considers it a punishment that murder is a crime, that's a price a civil society has to collectively pay, see earlier position on funding and counselling. You have one victim of rape, you're talking about making it a victim of rape and a victim of murder. It's illogical and legally confounded.