This.👇🏻
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (163)
sorted by:
I'm glad that you would do that, but that doesn't exist now. As it stands, the movement currently sets out to punish the victim before we make more strides to punish the rapist.
If the carrier considers it a punishment that murder is a crime, that's a price a civil society has to collectively pay, see earlier position on funding and counselling. You have one victim of rape, you're talking about making it a victim of rape and a victim of murder. It's illogical and legally confounded.
Have you ever heard of the trolley problem?
It's not a problem, you save the 5 and the one dies, your actions are to save life, the death is an unintended side effect. People who can't think believe you're choosing to kill someone, that was not the choice you made except where you had some personal vendetta against the guy and pulled the lever on the basis that you wanted to kill him. Pseuds love bringing up the trolley "problem" like it's some magical ethically grey example of moral philosophy and it's really not - sorry.
The singular death is the responsibility of who tied them there, the excess death is your responsibility because you could have saved them and elected not to, dressing cowardice as morality, as seen in abundance with the covid cult.
Totally fair answer! There is certainly the detail of you making the conscious choice to pull the lever. Let’s say the trolley is headed towards a group of 5 schoolchildren. You can let it run straight, or switch it to hit 5 adults.
What do you do?
Not to thread jump but... The trolley problem is bunk
The only solution is to try to derail the trolley by switching tracks mid way..
So you have heard of it, but you disregard it as a discussion of ethics and morality?