LOL! You And Whose Army?
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (198)
sorted by:
What action am I defending? I defended no action.
I agree-- if, as a Christian, you already follow the Noahide laws, then you're already among the righteous as far as Judaism is concerned.
Nor have I met any Chabadist or Talmud-educated Jew who tried to force me to follow them. They can encourage, suggest, give ideas for baby steps to observance, but never have they -- or I -- advocated forcing anyone to follow these laws of Halacha.
I am only concerned about being righteous in the eyes if Christ, not judaism. I follow these tenets to follow the words and to walk in the footsteps of Christ. Neither I, nor anyone else, needs talmudic "laws" for non-jews to dictate how to live, how to worship or not. The link I sent had 40 years of necons formally celebrating these so-called "laws" in the White House. Here are more. It is treason, an attack on the 1st Amendment, tto formally recognize religious "laws" on behalf of the US government. Of course they are nor enforceable because the US is not a country ruled by talmudic law and our God-given freedom is enshrined in our Constitution. Enforcement would only be possible with a one world government and I know enough about the cult of Schneerson to know that is very much what they are about and wield a lot of power, especially in the US, Russia, and Israel, of course .If you are not aware of their blatant NWO and talmudic supremacist goals, you should do some research or just stay naive. Have a blessed day!
If the United States was enforcing the seven laws of Noah on the populace, you may notice they are doing a terrible job. Outlawed sexual immorality? The Rainbow Jihad is one of the most powerful groups in America today. Do not deny or blaspheme G-d? Most entertainers and politicians do. So if you're concerned about the United States enforcing the laws of Noah on the population, I think that's quite unfounded. Whatever the globalist menace is that threatens us, it is not about to impose any sort of religious fundamentalism, unless you mean the fundamentalism of the new religion of "Woke."
So if there's any political stuff going on about the laws of Noah, it's probably the standard ceremonial crap for one demographic or another.... a "such and such" history month. Because, like I said, no one with eyes can believe that we're living under any form of the Noahide laws.
The Talmud is another story entirely. There's a lot of lies spread about it, but at its root it is a difficult book to read as Rabbis discuss the limits of the law, incorporating both the written and oral traditions. The naive reader reads some of the extreme decisions and interprets that as being commonplace, rather than realizing that they are examining the limits of the law, not it's everyday application.
It's about the desire to enforce a set of so-called Noahide "laws" upon all people of the world. You see no sinister implications there? I accepted Christ into my heart and follow these tenants because of Jesus Christ, not because a fanatical sect of Pharisaical leaders tell me I must do so. The fact that at least 40 years of necons eat up this Noahide "law" baloney should tell you something. By the way, non-Christians do not go to hell for not knowing Christ. Matthew 24:14 explains that the end of times will not begin until the word of Christ is shared with the entire world. Knowing and rejecting Christ is different than ignorance. There are too many false notions of Christianity in your post to even go over, so I'd advise anyone reading to be aware of that. I've heard it spoken often about how "difficult" the talmud is to understand. Yes, it's long and tedious, but there are very many straightforward passages that not only encourage immorality against gentiles, promote pedophilia against young gentile child, and dehumanize gentiles countless times. There is nothing.difficult to understand about these passages and their translation is not contested. These are not words I would ever consider a guide on how to live a decent life, so these Noahide "laws" can kick sand and definitely have no place being formally "celebrated" in the US government.This will be my end to this discussion, and again, have a blessed day!
There's a bit of irony in your post.
You're saying that I am misrepresenting Christianity and the idea that those who don't accept Jesus go to Hell, and that there is more to that then I put.
Fair enough.
So why is it too difficult to be on the other side of the coin, that you might have misconceptions related to the Talmud? If I represented false ideas of Christianity, is it possible you can have false ideas of Judaism, or indeed the Talmud?
There is actually lot of things contested in the translations of the Talmud. I had some interesting conversations with a scholar who went into the history of the Talmud and its editions, which is worth putting into a discussion.
There are some distinctions in Hallacha -- Jewish law -- between Jews and gentiles. It may sound odd, but you might consider that America -- or any nation -- would have different laws applicable to, say, citizens and foreigners.
Some time ago I was discussing someone who was taking a similar position to you, and comparing his arguments with the authority I mentioned. He was very filled with rage -- he did not care about counter arguments but called me many insulting names.
One of the positions he took was "why does the Talmud promote the marriage of young children?"
The authority, when I asked him and showed him the passage, laughed and said that this hater of the Talmud, if he read three pages further, would have found a passage that said the best thing to do is to marry a girl when she's of the age of majority and has a voice in who she would like to marry -- the opposite of his claim.
Why two apparently contradictory passages in the Talmud?
Well, in the ancient world, it wasn't uncommon to betroth children in arranged marriages. It seems odd to us, but it was more common in those times.
Also, there's the question on Talmudic passages on why girls who are molested at a young age count as virgins. The answer to that is because if a molested girl was no longer a virgin, that damaged her prospects for getting married at a later age. Instead, it is considered not the same, so she's allowed to grow up and get married as per normal, and get on with her life.
These are the kind of questions the Talmud deals with. It will sound strange when plucked devoid of context. "What? Why would it say a molested girl counts as a virgin? Are they saying it's okay?" No, it's not saying that at all; it's saying that should not count against her concerning her eligibility for marriage.
These are the kind of misconceptions that prop up in these conversations.