Remember! SCOTUS has ruled that ALL laws repugnant to the Constitution are automatically NULL AND VOID! Make this go viral!
(media.patriots.win)
W W G 1 W G A
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
hahahahaha ...... man, can you write some more? You would be a good fit for not the head-in-my-ass-bee for being so blind. You do not even know what a non-sequitur is. Your post drips non-sequitur.
Life, is not protected by the Constitution. YOU protect life or you do not. And If there is one thing USA INC is not interested in life for its own sake. People are.
Yeah ... that got you wondering, for sure. You, and I for that matter, have a vested interest in life. Why? Because we are alive! And we decide how we go living. Not one amendment will tell you HOW to live, and neither does the CONSTITUTION. (capitallized because that is the name of the document). You are responsible for how you live. And whether that is virtuous as per the description of George Washington's farewell address of 1793 or not, that is for you to decide. And yes, in liberty indeed you may encounter people living and thinking in a way that is totally alien to you. Nonya business.
And it just so happens, that is the ruling of Roe v Wade. Although I have to add that it also introduces state interest making the woman a ward of the state, which is exactly against all liberty amendments. And that turned into the monstrosity you are concerned about.
Damn, hahahaha, it is quite fitting to repeat the question: How do you read? Not 5:5 but eh .... lot of your own bias.
And then, please, get your head out of your ass. If there is one country loving to wage war, and bomb people, it is the USA INC. Now, I am not saying that applies to you. Your choices may be different. I do hope you' re going to ask me for proof. In anticipation of that, read: War is a racket by Smedley Butler. Empire thanks to USA INC.
Try this link for size. https://fivebooks.com/best-books/american-imperialism-ag-hopkins/
It would behoove you to rail against the FED as they are single handedly responsible for facilitating it. IF, the USA INC had abided by the Constitution, which would cause only gold and silver to be money in use, you would not have seen Planned Parenthood, and neither would you have seen Billy Gates' s role.
So why do you support baby murder?
Why do you support bullshit?
Tirany has many forms. Yours is one form, as you still have to grasp the meaning of liberty.
You do remember the Declaration of Independence, do you not? Do you find yourself in agreement with it?
If so, your position towards another is simply one on an equal plane. Your views and sensibilities are just that: yours.
As I have said: the money machine has turned a perfectly sensibel idea into a monstrosity it has become. That money machine is the single item that allows all you see playing out.
The empire and the bull shit wars. The meddling in other countries and regime change, the crony form of capitalism, the morally depraved way people are used for profit and power, blackmail, the totally inept legislators, the omnibus bills and the sneaking in of laws that are repugnant to liberty, the mass immigration, the mass influx of drugs, the detoriation of the social fabric of society, the deverythingetoriation of the fabric of civil society die to forfeiture, foreclosure, government handouts, you see it always comes back to one issue: follow the money.
It is amazing how all these so called well intentioned measure always turn sour and cause effects detrimental to liberty.
A nation of laws is a corrupt nation. Liberty does not require laws, it requires virtue. That is why you hear Ron Paul often say: let's try liberty for a change. And he is branded as a cook.
It is the world inverted into Davy Jones Locker. It fosters the export of a culture that is decadent, corrupt, pernicious, unnatural.
As to the topic at hand, in Roe v Wade, which most people still refuse to read, it is clearly demonstrated the relationship between liberty and choice under common law. Failing to see that, is also denying the essence of what liberty actually is.
Does the choice belong to the fed-government? No. That would put the fed-government out of its bounds.
If we allow government to proscribe what should be the outcome of a personal choice, what you end up with is a government proscribing and forcing you to take the jab, or anything else really under the guise of State-interest.
It fosters the idea that government has a higher claim to your life, your energy, your thinking, your acting, instead of where these issues truly are and should be: with each individual. It fosters the idea that you need supervision. It fosters the idea that you are incapable. It fosters the idea that you ARE a person instead of a human. In essence, thát is at stake.
And depending on how the current constellation of the Scotus rules, and from what I have read, I am not very thrilled, it will destroy the last remnants of the free exercise of your rights.
I do however consider a reverting back to the states of the abortion issue as a matter now embedded with the fed government to be a good thing. The reasoning however, determines wether that is so.
See a previous post of mine on here regarding this issue and analysis of the Roe v Wade ruling. There you will find links to searchvoat with the corresponding posts.
So, instead of framing this issue like you do, I am looking at it from a totally different perspective, a higher perspective. The perspective from the highest authority, the highest jurisdiction on this Earth: the individual human.
And only thinking humans can make moral choices in line with the law of Nature.
You're still conflating licenciousness with liberty. It's you who does not understand the true meaning of liberty.
Wrong. Now you're just delving into anarchist nonsense. Romans 13.
So again, why do you complicity support the murder of unborn babies? Repent.
And you are conflating your theocracy with liberty.
Romans 13 that is your answer? The answer of a failed Pharisee, frightening slaves to stay put? No wonder you are singing the praises of the 14th amendment.
No, instead the declaration of Independence offers a much more liber view of why governments are instituted: To protect the rights of man.
Why this charge? Because they are instituted by man.
Of the people, by the people, for the people.
Yes .... I am sure that is not in your to a failed Pharisee attributed scripture. And there is a reason why. We already tried the Roman 13 way. Somewhere around 800-1500. It was no success.
Again, that is why dr. Paul keep reminding us: let's try liberty for a change.
The reason you bring up the word: licentiousness, is interesting. A free man does not need license. YOU as a subordinate slave who thinks is free, need a license from his government by the ordination of your God. Interestingly. these days, you need a license for almost everything, is it not? There are rules regulating the length of a grass. And you are conforming to it. So, I infer it is you who is licentious.
It is a sorry thing when people start to use words they have no clue of what they are really saying. It sounds important. No doubt. But it is typical for sleepy people who have awakened to just one single part of the puzzle. They start big mouthing with delusions of grandeur and loaned authority, and import sounding words like licentiousness, while trying to cover up their own insecurities and appealing to some old odd ends stolen forth from holy writ, of which they know nothing about in the stream of time, but play the saint when most they are the devil.
Claiming such a premise as you do, first requires you to know me. Else, you are judgemental to such a degree as will influence the judgement with which you will be judged (according to Jesus and James). And I am sure, you do not know me. Hence, I am save to say you will be judged by your own standards of judgementalism.
Laws of nature are very precise. There are 8 of them. Two of them you know. Your failed Pharisee mentioned them. The other 6, you know not. And because you know them not, your view is only partial at best, if not deluded by superimposed questionable material interpreted in such a way as to best keep you a slave to a failed Pharisee version of what you call Christianity.
That is your prerogative of course. I recognize your liberty to live according to your own standards, whether they be purely yours, or induced by some interpretation of a bygone era. Do not bother me with your ancient myths.
Within the Law of Nature, there is no licentiousness. Account is being taken and will be presented in due course. Old vestiges will erode. Liberty will remain, as that is the embodiment of our being.
First: your question shows your judgemental attitude.
Second, you have no need for my answer as you already judged a matter before it is heard. According to, as you so eloquently quoted, scripture, but on this occasion I intend to call upon Proverbs, it is a folly from your side to do so.
Third, you still fail to see the Roe v Wade ACTUAL issue. I would wager, you never read the damn ruling. Yes ..... Yes, otherwise you would immediately have recognized what I am writing about. You did not, I am sad to say, and even if you had, you only could have read it with augmented eyes. Your reading ability is compromised as the Good Shepard asked: How do you read? Hence, the almost certain supposition, you are an illiterate on this topic.
But wait! It gets worse! I would posit: you never had to even go through considerations connected to an abortion yourself. All you have is a theocracy of your own image. So, it is reasonable to posit I am not only dealing with an illiterate who foolishly judges things before a case is heard, and is incapable of digesting what he is given, but also someone who has no subject-matter-jurisduction.
You're so vain!
And the best of all: Re-pent. I am going to do that with the misses. She's already calling.