I know a lot about Hitler and Germany, I don't listen to some Zionist shills on the history regarding them and everything else important and so. He has done impressive things yes I have to admit, but the people he put in power such as Himmler who was deep in occult activity. That I find to be suspicious given we know that's rather satanic, there's more I can list that I'm starting to question that I never gave much second thought about.
If you have more to criticize about Hitler than to give him credit, then I think you should spend more time looking at it from a different angle.
I have seen very little, aside from a couple of links, referring to what you suggest about Himmler. Since there is so little about this, and yet so MUCH evidence that Germany was much more honorable than Russia, Britain, or the U.S., I take it with a grain of salt. It's quite possible that this satanic reference may be part of the Zionist propaganda.
I wouldn't be telling you this if I was ignorant of Hitler, but by taking a look of the Q posts and his dealings with the Swiss bankers. Explain that one to me, we all know he hated them yet he didn't bother to invade because of the decisions he made regarding the economy and pillaging other nations of their gold in order to keep the nation moving forward and war effort sustained. Basically that's proving Germany would have gotten screwed regardless, financially they would have been in ruins even if they would have won because of how things were set up.
Correct me wrong if I'm wrong, there's another thing. They arrested a Rothschild, from there they didn't execute him but handed back for a small amount of money. Why would they do this if knowing anyways something would happen, I imagine one person being executed wouldn't really change much in the public during that time since Germany wasn't close to WW2 yet.
I've only seen a single newspaper clipping about that alleged Rothschild arrest...in a Zionist newspaper. If you are privy to more details about that than I am, then perhaps you know more. But given that the single clipping is all we seem to know about the alleged event, again, take it with a grain of salt.
Germany did invade supposedly "neutral" countries in an effort to stave off advances from both the East and the West, however, aside from isolated events, didn't destroy said countries in a blind, rabid rage as has been attributed to them. Invading Switzerland would have done nothing for Germany, because, 1) Switzerland was neutral, with many ethnic Germans living there, and 2) the bankers, even if they were captured, wouldn't have access to the monies they stole. Hitler knew that the bankers held allegiance to no country, so, there was no point in attacking a whole country for the sins of a red shield family.
As far as Germany "pillaging" other countries, this is Zionist drivel.
Didn't Germany use those captured French trucks for Operation Barbarossa, by pillaging I didn't say they did what the SU did. But in a way they did take some resources needed, the French fleet at point they tried to take it. I understand these things, but however did Hitler not make promises to those world leaders on the things he did that would not be done and broke his word as if it was nothing? I image if he didn't do this, they wouldn't able to call him a tyrant if wanting peace rather. By doing these said things he made himself look untrustworthy to many people even if he meant good, I don't see Trump doing any of that.
I know a lot about Hitler and Germany, I don't listen to some Zionist shills on the history regarding them and everything else important and so. He has done impressive things yes I have to admit, but the people he put in power such as Himmler who was deep in occult activity. That I find to be suspicious given we know that's rather satanic, there's more I can list that I'm starting to question that I never gave much second thought about.
If you know a lot about Hitler and Germany, I'm assuming you've also considered the content here: https://ww2truth.com/europa-the-last-battle/ and here: https://thegreateststorynevertold.tv/ ?
If you have more to criticize about Hitler than to give him credit, then I think you should spend more time looking at it from a different angle.
I have seen very little, aside from a couple of links, referring to what you suggest about Himmler. Since there is so little about this, and yet so MUCH evidence that Germany was much more honorable than Russia, Britain, or the U.S., I take it with a grain of salt. It's quite possible that this satanic reference may be part of the Zionist propaganda.
I wouldn't be telling you this if I was ignorant of Hitler, but by taking a look of the Q posts and his dealings with the Swiss bankers. Explain that one to me, we all know he hated them yet he didn't bother to invade because of the decisions he made regarding the economy and pillaging other nations of their gold in order to keep the nation moving forward and war effort sustained. Basically that's proving Germany would have gotten screwed regardless, financially they would have been in ruins even if they would have won because of how things were set up.
Correct me wrong if I'm wrong, there's another thing. They arrested a Rothschild, from there they didn't execute him but handed back for a small amount of money. Why would they do this if knowing anyways something would happen, I imagine one person being executed wouldn't really change much in the public during that time since Germany wasn't close to WW2 yet.
I've only seen a single newspaper clipping about that alleged Rothschild arrest...in a Zionist newspaper. If you are privy to more details about that than I am, then perhaps you know more. But given that the single clipping is all we seem to know about the alleged event, again, take it with a grain of salt.
Germany did invade supposedly "neutral" countries in an effort to stave off advances from both the East and the West, however, aside from isolated events, didn't destroy said countries in a blind, rabid rage as has been attributed to them. Invading Switzerland would have done nothing for Germany, because, 1) Switzerland was neutral, with many ethnic Germans living there, and 2) the bankers, even if they were captured, wouldn't have access to the monies they stole. Hitler knew that the bankers held allegiance to no country, so, there was no point in attacking a whole country for the sins of a red shield family.
As far as Germany "pillaging" other countries, this is Zionist drivel.
Didn't Germany use those captured French trucks for Operation Barbarossa, by pillaging I didn't say they did what the SU did. But in a way they did take some resources needed, the French fleet at point they tried to take it. I understand these things, but however did Hitler not make promises to those world leaders on the things he did that would not be done and broke his word as if it was nothing? I image if he didn't do this, they wouldn't able to call him a tyrant if wanting peace rather. By doing these said things he made himself look untrustworthy to many people even if he meant good, I don't see Trump doing any of that.
Germany 1933-1939 sounds a lot like today Russia - Ukraine and NATO encroachment.
Sometimes you play the card you were given ......