We've been over this before Pur, and I certainly hope that anyone reading my comments can see clearly that they are not intended as an attack on your intent, motive or integrity, all of which I am happy to be the first defender.
You DO forget sometimes, even if in the vast majority of times, you do not (forget).
I apologize for saying "quite often". That's not true, and you are right to call me out on that. Sometimes maybe, but 'occasionally' or 'very occasionally' would be much more accurate. (See corrections to original comment)
.... But I often pay attention to your posts and more than once I sometimes see GAW pedes express a misunderstanding that you are the original creator when I know (knowing your modus operandii), know that you are not (because you and I often review the same Telegram accounts).
So, should I just ignore that? Maybe.
Please do note, however; both you and I know that you're not omitting info (when you do) in some sleazy motive to get some upvotes or namefaggery. Also, I attempted above to articulate that giving credit ('kudos') is not really the core issue here; rather, by letting pedes identify original source, you can actually nudge them towards those sources if they are inclined or inspired to get more. ("Gee, that account posts really good stuff. Maybe I should check it out!")
I'd like to suggest that identifying the source is, in some cases, as important an element of information as the body content is as well.
By the way, you ALSO could have indicated that this was NOT your original post/content, by even identifying ("from an anon Telegram channel") or something like that, right? Even if you were not clear yourself about original sauce. Although, with Telegram, at least with my settings, I always see the origin the content was forwarded from.
"I don't provide any one link because I don't know..." Suggestion: add ONE of the links anyway. You got it from somewhere, right? That would at least allow pedes to follow or track it down. Like I said, it's NOT about credit, but about properly identifying (some) source. At least, you'll be making it clear it come from somewhere other than yourself, and thereby reduce the incidents where GAW pedes mistakenly attribute the content to you (which they sometimes do).
Maybe that's a setting in telegram, that either shows that or not? If that is a setting, and your account doesn't show that Forwarded From ...... info, then one cannot fault you for not knowing.
But, I'm not trying to fault you. I'm just trying to clarify and make your content more comprehensive, reduce misunderstanding and misapprehension. Kind of the way a little sucker fish latches on to a massive shark. (You're the shark, here, with my contributions definitely comparable to a small sucker fish, by scale!) As many have pointed out, your contributions here are BOSS.
Hopefully, this clears a few other things up for you?
We've been over this before Pur, and I certainly hope that anyone reading my comments can see clearly that they are not intended as an attack on your intent, motive or integrity, all of which I am happy to be the first defender.
You DO forget sometimes, even if in the vast majority of times, you do not (forget).
I apologize for saying "quite often". That's not true, and you are right to call me out on that. Sometimes maybe, but 'occasionally' or 'very occasionally' would be much more accurate. (See corrections to original comment)
.... But I often pay attention to your posts and more than once I sometimes see GAW pedes express a misunderstanding that you are the original creator when I know (knowing your modus operandii), know that you are not (because you and I often review the same Telegram accounts).
So, should I just ignore that? Maybe.
Please do note, however; both you and I know that you're not omitting info (when you do) in some sleazy motive to get some upvotes or namefaggery. Also, I attempted above to articulate that giving credit ('kudos') is not really the core issue here; rather, by letting pedes identify original source, you can actually nudge them towards those sources if they are inclined or inspired to get more. ("Gee, that account posts really good stuff. Maybe I should check it out!")
I'd like to suggest that identifying the source is, in some cases, as important an element of information as the body content is as well.
By the way, you ALSO could have indicated that this was NOT your original post/content, by even identifying ("from an anon Telegram channel") or something like that, right? Even if you were not clear yourself about original sauce. Although, with Telegram, at least with my settings, I always see the origin the content was forwarded from.
"I don't provide any one link because I don't know..." Suggestion: add ONE of the links anyway. You got it from somewhere, right? That would at least allow pedes to follow or track it down. Like I said, it's NOT about credit, but about properly identifying (some) source. At least, you'll be making it clear it come from somewhere other than yourself, and thereby reduce the incidents where GAW pedes mistakenly attribute the content to you (which they sometimes do).
Maybe that's a setting in telegram, that either shows that or not? If that is a setting, and your account doesn't show that Forwarded From ...... info, then one cannot fault you for not knowing.
But, I'm not trying to fault you. I'm just trying to clarify and make your content more comprehensive, reduce misunderstanding and misapprehension. Kind of the way a little sucker fish latches on to a massive shark. (You're the shark, here, with my contributions definitely comparable to a small sucker fish, by scale!) As many have pointed out, your contributions here are BOSS.
Hopefully, this clears a few other things up for you?
Hopefully, we're all good here?
All good....
I was about to ask, where have your fan squad gone these days?
kek, here they still are, those cute little downvoters, 1 or 2.
But it looks like they appreciate my work, too! I'm honored.
If you just ignore them completely they tend to get bored and move along...don't feed them...😉