The Trolls Strike Back: 2000 Mules evidence rejected by leftists on Twitter. Let's box them in. Bonus for trolling the leftist "investigative journalist" calling D'Souza a racist con man in his article.

posted 2 years ago by Mister_Winston 2 years ago by Mister_Winston +22 / -0

A left wing investigative journalist named Greg Palast wrote an article attempting to discredit 2000 Mules. It's here: https://tinyurl.com/wn6t4knc

I have two ongoing debates branching off from Palast's tweet of his article.

First thread: https://tinyurl.com/mvv6zxnr

Second thread: https://tinyurl.com/65z25zd3

These are their arguments:

Geo tracking is not accurate. The proximity can be off by 93 feet. "If someone is jogging by a few boxes they are counted as a mule."
Even if these people walked within proximity of boxes, there's no proof of interaction with them.
There's no video of one person at more than one box. These people were dropping off ballots for relatives.

Concerning point three, one person claims "My brother in law probably made a half dozen trips all by himself. All he did was help people vote legitimately." I believe this person sincerely believes this activity is legitimate. That's why I think these people can be red pilled, even if their awakening is delayed.

So that's the point of this post. Let's plant some seeds in these people's minds. I don't think they're all a lost cause. Some are, most aren't.

If you want to jump in, please eliminate any emotion. We want to fight opinions with facts. Source all arguments.

I'll continue my debate with them later when I'm off work.

4 comments

4 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (4)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– Mister_Winston [S] 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Uncover DC has already posted useful counter arguments here: https://tinyurl.com/tzsf5efc

permalink save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– deleted 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

– Mr_A 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I believe they said 10 drop box visits, which might be the same box 10 times. Not 100%, but that's my recollection. Even so, add in the visits to the central offices, and it's a solid indicator.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Mister_Winston [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I explained all this to them. They refused to accept it. Psychologically they cannot. Once they do, it's the point of no return.

So the left's talking points on 2000 Mules will be:

Geo location through phone app is unreliable due to its 90ft proximity.
People stuffing ballot boxes were doing so for family which is legal.
There's no video of individuals going to multiple boxes, therefore D'Souza and TTV have nothing.
Even if people went to multiple boxes and NGO offices, that's not proof of a crime therefore there was no crime.

They're backed into a corner on this one. Wait until more data comes out. The excuses will become more lame until they finally say "Ok well sometimes cheating is justified when the candidate is a Nazi like Trump." Bet on it.