The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.
Are the DeepState members abusing this clause? Is that what Q's trying to show us, that they can avoid any and all questioning unless they are among their own ilk?
Would it apply to someone like Durham demanding a deposition? Would they then, necessarily, have to testify on a Congressional floor or maybe in the White House to avoid breaching the protections set forth in this clause?
If they aren't found guilty of treason, does that mean you can't question them to arrive at a guilty of treason verdict? Are they abusing the order of operations in the law with shady semantics?
https://qalerts.app/?n=4209
Article I, Section 6, Clause 1:
The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.
Are the DeepState members abusing this clause? Is that what Q's trying to show us, that they can avoid any and all questioning unless they are among their own ilk?
Would it apply to someone like Durham demanding a deposition? Would they then, necessarily, have to testify on a Congressional floor or maybe in the White House to avoid breaching the protections set forth in this clause?
If they aren't found guilty of treason, does that mean you can't question them to arrive at a guilty of treason verdict? Are they abusing the order of operations in the law with shady semantics?