To be clear, 2000 Mules presents the strongest case we've seen of the 2020 election being stolen, and the film should still be leveraged to make arrests and expose the NGO's involved.

But this crap below is counteractive to the cause.

The claim by TTV about using their geotracking data to identify the suspects in the murder of Secoriea Turner is misleading and needs to be addressed by them and D'Souza.

From WaPo (https://tinyurl.com/2p9x4vsb):

“You could see, visually, that there were only a handful of unique devices that could possibly have pulled the trigger,” Phillips says. He shows a circle overlaid on a map, within which five dots of different colors are visible — dots indicating “the only potential legitimate shooters,” he says. He explains that, having done this analysis, his team turned information about those devices over to the FBI.

“Now, I read, they've arrested two suspects,” D'Souza says.

“They have,” Phillips says, somberly.

There’s a reason for this scene. Phillips and Engelbrecht’s analysis of geotracking data is the crux of D’Souza’s claims about there being an army of people who were dispatched to collect ballots before the presidential election. If data can be used to identify and arrest criminals in one case, the movie would have us believe, it can be similarly used in the case of all this alleged election fraud.

But looking at the case more closely, you see how the impression you’re meant to have is wildly misleading. The shooting led to the death of Secoriea Turner on July 4, 2020. It was far from a “cold case” — police arrested a suspect about two weeks later after he turned himself in. A second suspect was arrested in early August 2021 — not by federal law enforcement but by state officials. There is no indication that geolocation data played a role in either arrest, much less data provided by Phillips’s team.

This is no bueno. It sets us all up for failure when we're trying to convince others to take the movie seriously.