No vehicles (wtf???) in this context at all. Not a single mention of vehicle (wtf???) anywhere.
he is not the same Biden (figuratively) as he used to be.
Okay fren. Its your right to live in any delusion you choose to live in, and I am not gonna begrudge you that. Whatever makes you feel comfortable, lest your friends think you are crazy right? Oh the horror, right?
Sorry typing fast on a phone in the backseat of a car. (on vacation visiting relatives)
The vehicle is an analogy... to be shot means to be useless or decrepit.
It clear form the context of the video that this interview was about campaigning and how trump is clearly outpacing biden with rallies.
Trump talks about bidens mental state and inability to have real interviews, where he is relying on a teleprompter, and he can barely even do that. it shows that biden is shot. not literally but figuratively. he is mentally decrepit.
further, truth says biden is shot not was shot. meaning biden is not a "was/were" since he is still alive.
I dont ever make decisions based on friends, i am my own person, and if they are a friend then they will accept that.
I also don't just believe anything just because people say so, clearly i am going against the grain here, the only site other than truth social that i am active daily on. Why would i go again the grain where i feel I am most at home in? because the truth needs to be found regardless of popularity of it.
I dont assume what the truth is, i am a data driven person. the data shows he is biden.
It clear form the context of the video that this interview was about campaigning and how trump is clearly outpacing biden with rallies.
Fren, do you always take what Trump says literally? He will never come out and claim Biden was shot, literally, with a bullet in the head. Everything he says has a meaning, and this is just one hint. When you consider this with all the other pieces of the puzzle you can start getting an idea of what the truth is, and yes it might be wrong and we will never know the full truth - but that applies to everything.
We have the fact that the guy on the TV claiming to be Biden looks distinctively different from the guy we saw all the years before. Thats one piece of the puzzle.
Second, we have Trump talking about Biden being the Dem nominee long before Dems had picked their nominee. This means White Hats had already decided who will be allowed to become the president-on-TV during devolution.
Third, if the White Hats had the option of picking someone, would they pick a guy under their control, or a guy who is one of the worst criminals and nothing to lose? Clearly you want someone under your control.
When you take all this, and then add all the hints in various clips of Trump talking about Biden, it paints a compelling picture.
i am a data driven person. the data shows he is biden.
The fallacy of this approach is that we do not know what the data is. Data is always hidden from us, and all we see are illusions. So if you are data driven, you are working with fake and non-existent data - and hence it makes sense to listen to your intuition rather than just being "data driven"
I don't like to assume what happens, I have hope and faith but I won't make assumptions as to the underworkings.
All I can do is take objective facts, empirical data, and task theories using those to determine what the most likely outcome is of things that can be observed, not things that are hidden.
I started this journey out of seeing a weird image of Biden with a strange tab on his ear which looked like the tab of a mask. I didn't decide what it was exactly but was very intrigued as to the possibilities, one of which, was a mask. Another possible rationale is that its facial tape, another being a manipulated image, etc. I don't like to assume, so from there I began looking at all of his photos from the same angle, only then did I learn through observation and testing that his right ear is webbed and deformed, it has been since birth.
I am sure Trump says coded messages and its fun to try and figure out what those could mean, it's not concrete, and it's not empirical. So I can't weigh it against empirical data as an equal. Its just a personality trait of mine I guess. I am all about data.
Biden does in fact look very different. This often happens when people get plastic surgeries and botox injections, and hair implants as they are aging. It's my opinion that no one should ever get elective surgeries to make themselves look younger as it seems to always backfire once they get into the later years.
I am sure there are hidden agendas and hidden chess-piece movements, im not going to say there is or is not as a matter of fact because no one can know unless they are a player. I can only deal with data that is in front of me. Not the possibilities of things we do not have information or insight on.
I have two reservations about the logic of "Whitehats controlling Biden"
If they had the power, and control of the game. Why couldn't they control Biden himself?
If the whitehats are controlling Biden's every move, then they must believe that the end justifies the means. Since there is a person in the office doing bad things and literally killing innocent people, if he is being controlled by our side, then our site is not very good. You don't sacrifice innocent people to make bad people look bad. It would be strange to Make someone do bad things, to get people to turn from them, and turn to you because in the end, you would be the responsible party for all those sins.
Being data-driven is not a fallacy, data is all around us. Our senses need data. We have images and videos of Biden, if the images and video are HD enough to see fine wrinkles, those wrinkles can be used as a large set of data points.
We have audio of Biden speaking, audio is a form of data, and a person's voice is unique to them. A voice actor can get close, but audio programs do exist to tell if the voices truly match and can tell differences between actors and the real deal.
In the end, I can only be swayed by empirical data, I can't rely on assumptions of what could be happening within a Psychological Warzone- it just wouldn't be wise.
lol, I am not sure what you are on, but here is the full context of the clip I am talking about: https://video.foxnews.com/v/6190933226001#sp=show-clips
No vehicles (wtf???) in this context at all. Not a single mention of vehicle (wtf???) anywhere.
Okay fren. Its your right to live in any delusion you choose to live in, and I am not gonna begrudge you that. Whatever makes you feel comfortable, lest your friends think you are crazy right? Oh the horror, right?
Fren, do you always take what Trump says literally? He will never come out and claim Biden was shot, literally, with a bullet in the head. Everything he says has a meaning, and this is just one hint. When you consider this with all the other pieces of the puzzle you can start getting an idea of what the truth is, and yes it might be wrong and we will never know the full truth - but that applies to everything.
We have the fact that the guy on the TV claiming to be Biden looks distinctively different from the guy we saw all the years before. Thats one piece of the puzzle.
Second, we have Trump talking about Biden being the Dem nominee long before Dems had picked their nominee. This means White Hats had already decided who will be allowed to become the president-on-TV during devolution.
Third, if the White Hats had the option of picking someone, would they pick a guy under their control, or a guy who is one of the worst criminals and nothing to lose? Clearly you want someone under your control.
When you take all this, and then add all the hints in various clips of Trump talking about Biden, it paints a compelling picture.
The fallacy of this approach is that we do not know what the data is. Data is always hidden from us, and all we see are illusions. So if you are data driven, you are working with fake and non-existent data - and hence it makes sense to listen to your intuition rather than just being "data driven"
I have two reservations about the logic of "Whitehats controlling Biden"
100% even the morality part