One can create something based off of factual data.
I created the Gif, correct. I did not however, create the images. The gif is simply an animation blend between the images which have been matched up to lay on top of one another.
This is done, to determine how much of a change has occurred between the images. Specifically around the nose area. With this gif the data (images) Are easier to digest and interpret.
If this is mental gymnastics to you then your mind is out of shape. (Mean Joke)
I know it was, and the video does nothing to add to what you are saying. In the video you can see that as he pulls his mask up, he nose begins to return. I can give you an exact time stamp of this example if you want or i can make another gif
Square 1. What is the video + image initially suppose to prove within the context of the specific data? - Would it be that a persons nose doesn't do that from masks? Or are you now trying to say, bidens nose hasnt been shown to do this before and because it does in this video, he is fake?
Additionally, lets say, you never have seen his nose do this with masks and therefore he is fake and that's why I should instead spend most likely over 8 hours looking at videos of him with masks on talking and analyze each and every one. (only for you to then deny again or change the subject or say "why you trying so hard?")
You have a logical conundrum
If I find a video from 2022 where its the same looking old, skinny, stretched faced-Biden wearing a mask and his nose isn't doing this, does that make the Biden in the new video real or fake? Of coarse you will still claim he is also fake in the new video.
Then if I find another video where he does have his nose bend with the mask does that mean that both these Bidens are real? You will presumably still say well then both videos show a fake Biden.
So regardless of what evidence to claim you want, in reality to can't accept that he is real. Unless you can give me a route with the data thats been provided or data that can be collected publicly, You are not actually thinking logically through each argument and considering the evidence, you are actually suffering from cognitive dissonance.
If you think you are suffering from CD, then you must be able to provide some route to convince you. otherwise, you mind is set and you are blind to any evidence to the contrary.
For me for example, I am willing to see, and analyze and discuss anything relate towards him being fake. I am open to being persuaded, and really anything could possibly convince me, if I analyze it and the data presents itself in such a way that the only conclusion is that he is fake.
An example of this: Provide two image: both with the same lighting, facial expressions, head positioning, and image quality (high). But the wrinkle map of Biden is either in consistent, or completely different. By inconsistent I mean, on 1 he has a short bridge wrinkle on his right eye and a long bridge wrinkle on his left eye, but the other image it is switch. Or simply, one where the right ear doesnt have webbing, but the face still has the right side wrinkle map (meaning it wasn't a mirrored image)
I know it was, and the video does nothing to add to what you are saying. In the video you can see that as he pulls his mask up, he nose begins to return. I can give you an exact time stamp of this example if you want or i can make another gif
Square 1. What is the video + image initially suppose to prove within the context of the specific data? - Would it be that a persons nose doesn't do that from masks? Or are you now trying to say, bidens nose hasnt been shown to do this before and because it does in this video, he is fake?
Additionally, lets say, you never have seen his nose do this with masks and therefore he is fake and that's why I should instead spend most likely over 8 hours looking at videos of him with masks on talking and analyze each and every one. (only for you to then deny again or change the subject or say "why you trying so hard?")
You have a logical conundrum