Comments (81)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
CaptainQirk [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

But that goes for literally any info source. Thus the source isn't the issue but individual discernment.

We still post news articles despite questionable veracity, so I think I'll keep trying to improve my discernment but also keep reading whatever I want to read.

Nothing is more questionable than someone telling you not to read something.

Quixotic -6 points ago +5 / -11

You have poor discernment so I am recommending avoiding a platform that is only ever fake. But you go ahead - continue to gave poor discernment.

CaptainQirk [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair, you don't know if it's real or fake.

I do remember seeing the exact same kind of tally shenanigans happening in real time in 2016 when it was Trump v Clinton. That stuff I can personally vouch for. It all just got forgotten when Trump got the victory.

So at the very least I can say I know for a fact that this shit has been happening, so I'm entirely likely to believe that it's happened again considering that it's the same group of retards doing this.

But by all means, continue to be an obnoxious dick.

Quixotic -1 points ago +1 / -2

And that’s exactly how it works: the fakers hack your confirmation bias (aka poor discernment).