First, his article: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/05/17/special-prosecutor-frames-the-background-of-the-sussmann-case-the-fbi-was-manipulated-duped-by-clinton-campaign/
TLDR; The FBI, the CIA, Obama's cabinet, the who's who of the deep state are being setup to be protected by the Sussman trial. They were "duped" by Hillary's henchmen. Those poor poor souls. 🙄
Fact Based Argument
Sundance is one of those people that you never really want to take on directly. He is a heavy weight when it comes to understanding politics and the deep state. It is not wise to casually disagree with him. He is well researched and puts a lot of thought behind his opinions.
So I am not going to do that. Because on the face of it, he is right. The trial is precisely being framed as Sussman and other's duped the poor FBI.
"But BC, you said he was wrong!"
Well, his overall assessment of the situation is wrong, not his laser focus on this particular trial.
In this particular trial, no FBI, clowns etc are going to be found guilty. We already know that. We know that, because THEY ARE NOT ON TRIAL... here.
Who is on trial? Sussman. And what is he accused of doing? Lying to the FBI to use them as a political weapon. So strategically, what good would it do to go scorched earth on the FBI right now? None. In fact, it would be a strategic error. They are more likely to COOPERATE to make Sussman the fall guy for crimes they were willingly participating in.
The only way Sundance's fears play out, is if Durham is a one trick pony and this is the only trial. No one can undo the corruption and centralized power of the deep state in a single action. Or even a dozen actions, or 100. There are currently 290,000+ sealed indictments as of this moment. That's more likely the scope of righting this ship.
So that is the logical argument. Here is some hopium that u/Qlueless shared with me.
Hopium
Both the sealed indictment tracker site and this qpost, have a 310x163 picture of the US flag. Now, that is admittedly some interesting but weak hopium. It gets a little stranger.
As a long time amateur photographer, I recognized right away that the image was upscaled from a slightly lower resolution source. If you blow the images up, you'll see some tips of the stars are 2 pixels wide (as one example). This means it was upsampled using nearest neighbor (simple upscaling algorithm) from a source close to and slightly smaller in size. In addition, the "bad boys" flag and the Q flag are not copies of one another.
For all intents and purposes they are a match, but under the covers they are not. The Bad Boys image was saved as a PNG with a 55 color pallet (white and various shades of red and blue). The Q post image is exactly the same, but with 57 colors in its pallet (again, white with various shades of red and blue).
So why is THAT significant? I believe that Q was trying to make a subtle connection to the indictments for us as part of NCSWIC. However, using an exact copy of a relatively plain US Flag graphic is a little too subtle. Knowing that both images are not originals and appear to come from the same source, helps tie it together a little better, while maintaining plausible deniability. Because only the same source, upsampled with the same method, to the same final resolution, would produce that particular image. And by altering the color palette slightly, proves the image wasn't simply copied. Each image was intentional.
So to reiterate, the indictment tracker website and that Q post both grabbed used the exact same source image, both upsampled it in the exact same way, and both upsampled it to the exact same resolution. Thats a lot of coincidences for one image.
And what does that particular Q post say?
NCSWIC
And the flag size... just an odd size really, 310x163.
Post 310:
What has been said about the US Military?
The speech yesterday verified and unlocked so much.
Expand your thinking.
Re-read crumbs.
Re-listen to yesterday's speech.
Connect the 'markers.'
News (in all forms) unlocks the map.
Expand your thinking.
The Great Awakening.
Q
Post 163:
1&2 confirmed.
You will need for coming weeks.
Put it this way, six attempts were made to silence the witness scheduled to appear tomorrow.
Special operators on guard.
Q
👀
Sundance developed a very elaborate theory of how he thought it would all go down. His research was great, but it was all made to fit into his theory. When it didn't go down that way he lost all faith. In my opinion he is not a lateral thinker. Many patriots are not lateral thinkers. They tend to be honest and want to resolve things in the most direct away possible.
My cousin is the same way. His approach is basically kick down the door, kill the bad guy, save the day and be called a hero. He can't understand why something like Q and all these games are even needed. Just round up the bad guys. Boom. Done.
He doesn't get that it won't work because the people we fight are sociopaths and psychopaths. They don't fight fair and they have traps rigged for simple people.
If you try that approach with them this is how it actually goes down: kick down the door, kill the person you thought was the bad guy but was in fact a fall person, get arrested for killing a minority, all your friends and family are forced to denounce you or face ruin by the MSM, child porn and nazi books are planted on your computer by the government, all your old social media is brought up to show how evil you are, MSM plasters doctored photos of you stealing candy from a baby, dozens of blue-haired womxn come forward to scream how you sexually assaulted them, you lose your job, and even before the trial you are labeled public enemy number 1. Your loved ones are now losing sleep and developing health problems for the stress and harassment. And you struggle to find a platform to get your side of the story heard.
It is because the enemy fights dirty that Q and Trump use 5D chess.
Sundance, for all his research, still doesn't understand just how dirty the other sides and just how evil they just truly are. He thinks you can fight them by just showing the public the truth. No, it'll take more than that to wake people up. If you just tell them the truth they won't believe you. They must be shown.
Thank you so much for your reasonable and logical explanations. You have succinctly nailed what has bothered me about Sundance for a few years and why I ultimately elected to stay away from his analysis. His wasn't just dooming...it was a deeper "injury" than that. And you have theorized a good explanations for that here.