I almost wonder if Trump is setting these people up in the Senate, don't forget Vance in Ohio, so he can later come through like a wrecking ball or a bowling ball and knock down ALL the pins at once.
There are people with access to AI who probably struggle with all the players and plays on this board. But my hunch is he endorses people he knows can win and he knows will play the role he needs them to play. Not sure they know that.
Yes. I have said before. I don't think he shares the typical view of whether a person is good or bad, black or white but instead sees people as useful. Can he move this person/piece into this position to serve a temporary purpose? This is independent of whether the person knows they are being useful or not and whether deep state will catch him doing it. You don't have to like or admire a playing piece on the chess board in order to move it into a position that works in your favor.
He endorsed way more than three candidates across PA. This Truth followed two others specifically about the Senate race. And, the Senate contest was a three-way race. I feel confident this is about the Senate Race.
— President Joe Biden on Tuesday warned voters unhappy with soaring inflation and his stalled domestic agenda against turning power over to “ultra-MAGA” Republicans in the midterm elections as he increasingly tries to cast former President Donald Trump and his adherents as a political foil.
Think about this for a moment. Why did Biden win the Democrat nomination? The “perfect” phone call to Ukraine made it appear he was the person President Trump most feared. But, in reality, was the opponent the President wanted.
What is “Ultra” MAGA designed to sound like to Republican voters? The primary candidates the Dems most fear, but in reality do not fear at all, they want them to win.
How many people endorsed by President Trump were called “Ultra” MAGA? Or was it just used to prop up people he did not endorse?
I almost wonder if Trump is setting these people up in the Senate, don't forget Vance in Ohio, so he can later come through like a wrecking ball or a bowling ball and knock down ALL the pins at once.
There are people with access to AI who probably struggle with all the players and plays on this board. But my hunch is he endorses people he knows can win and he knows will play the role he needs them to play. Not sure they know that.
Yes. I have said before. I don't think he shares the typical view of whether a person is good or bad, black or white but instead sees people as useful. Can he move this person/piece into this position to serve a temporary purpose? This is independent of whether the person knows they are being useful or not and whether deep state will catch him doing it. You don't have to like or admire a playing piece on the chess board in order to move it into a position that works in your favor.
Excellent comment !
My take is he is simply stating when any of the 3 are announced a winner we win, because they are all MAGA...?
Leverage trumps loyalty.
Is he speaking of the PA Senate race though or just PA candidates in general?
He endorsed way more than three candidates across PA. This Truth followed two others specifically about the Senate race. And, the Senate contest was a three-way race. I feel confident this is about the Senate Race.
Could someone enlighten me (and probably others) as to what “ultra” MAGA really means? Thanks!
https://ph.news.yahoo.com/biden-pushes-ultra-maga-label-183313269.html
Think about this for a moment. Why did Biden win the Democrat nomination? The “perfect” phone call to Ukraine made it appear he was the person President Trump most feared. But, in reality, was the opponent the President wanted.
What is “Ultra” MAGA designed to sound like to Republican voters? The primary candidates the Dems most fear, but in reality do not fear at all, they want them to win.
How many people endorsed by President Trump were called “Ultra” MAGA? Or was it just used to prop up people he did not endorse?