Consider if it were a document. I claim the document is fake. You claim that the document is real and point to the document as evidence that it is real. This alone is not a sufficiently valid form of evidence to prove that, as that is the subject matter in question.
There is no evidence either way, so the matter is up in the air.
Maybe it is evidence to you if you don't think that the Deep State has billions of dollars to fake whatever they want with plastic surgeons, CGI, script writers. I do think they have billions of dollars to do things like this, however.
"It's all a movie/fake/lie" is pretty much the premise of Q. So you are in the wrong here by default.
Why? I don't see any difference between my statement that it's fake than your insistence that it is real. Both are assertions without evidence.
wut? r u hi?
Consider if it were a document. I claim the document is fake. You claim that the document is real and point to the document as evidence that it is real. This alone is not a sufficiently valid form of evidence to prove that, as that is the subject matter in question.
There is no evidence either way, so the matter is up in the air.
Maybe it is evidence to you if you don't think that the Deep State has billions of dollars to fake whatever they want with plastic surgeons, CGI, script writers. I do think they have billions of dollars to do things like this, however.
"It's all a movie/fake/lie" is pretty much the premise of Q. So you are in the wrong here by default.
Did you wake up on the retarded side of the bed this morning?