Sure. Wells Fargo personnel were sentenced to prison for those schemes. That means that Wells Fargo is bad.
But what similar expose is there for the Freemasons? So far the only real claim on this comment channel is that a prominent Freemanson wrote that Freemasons worshiped the devil, which we found was a widely known 1800's era hoax from a guy who spent his time writing anti-Catholic books - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9o_Taxil
To be anywhere near similar to your example we would need to see that Freemasons have been convicted of sacrificing people or whatever crimes are alleged against them.
The Wiki page I linked to said it was a widely known hoax. You're going to have to address that and show that it's not. If prominent Freemasons were writing in books that they worship the devil that should be pretty easy to prove, right? But no, instead you choose to deny that the matter is in question.
Who cares? You guys are pointing to stupid shit like special handshakes and jump to the conclusion that they are controlling the world and eating babies. The Boy Scouts also have special symbols and have a special handshake. Several US Presidents were Boy Scouts. By the same logic exhibited about the Freemasons, the Boy Scouts were controlling the US Government during those presidencies.
Seriously, look in the mirror on how stupid you sound when you say things like that.
As far as I can see from researching that is that oath references something Fremasons were reciting in the 1800's, which mirrors various military organizations and other groups. The Catholic organization who united against mass immigration, the Knight's Templar, made a similar oath promising to submit themselves to death if they betray their brethren. The dramatic wording is meant to convey seriousness.
You shouldn't betray your brothers, even if you are a religious group who worships God. They get a pass from me.
We can find a ton of liberals saying the exact same things about Christianity and Catholicism, and how it is really bad and evil, that they don't believe what they preach behind closed doors, and that priests are pedos or that they protect pedos, etc.
There are a ton of people who hate religion. Why shouldn't I assume that there are just more people lying and conspiring about a religiously-aligned organization?
Well that's the problem, you're saying, not showing. Anyone can say anything.
I was looking into one of the historical hoaxers who was claiming that Freemasons were evil and it seem that he spent his time writing anti-Catholic books - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9o_Taxil
How do we know, exactly, that the conspiracy theorists are not simply people who hate Christians/Catholics/Religion?
That's not from the horse's mouth. I put that into Google search and Google AI said:
This text is a fabricated passage from the infamous 19th-century "Taxil Hoax," designed to falsely link Freemasonry to Satanism. It is not a legitimate Masonic document, but rather a deceptive invention by Leo Taxil, who later admitted to fabricating such documents to discredit the Freemasons. The passage expresses a Gnostic-style duality rather than mainstream Masonry.
It linked me to this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxil_hoax
The quote you provided appears in this section: "The Luciferian quote - A series of paragraphs about Lucifer are frequently associated with the Taxil hoax. They read:"
In order for the bank to be nefarious it needs to be shown that they are nefarious. At present we have internet randos making wild claims about Freemasons eating babies and enslaving mankind.
The online conspiracy videos are equivalent to a homeless man standing outside of a bank, screaming to bystanders about the evil banks. Not really the best quality source there. We have no idea who those people in the videos are or if they have a bias which prevents them from being truthful.
Albert Pike was a prominent freemason. I asked ChatGPT:
where does Albert Pike state in his writings that Lucifer is the entity that freemasonry is dedicated to?
It responded:
Short answer: He doesn’t. There is no authentic place in the writings of Albert Pike where he says that Freemasonry is dedicated to Lucifer. The claim comes from a hoax and later misquotations, not Pike’s real works.
It then went on with a long response about how it was a 1800's-era hoax to demonize freemasonry.
I have. It was an organization which our founding fathers were a part of. Why should I believe that Christians like George Washington and others were part of an evil organization when I can just believe that anti-Christian groups are trying to demonize Christians?
The same demonizing is made about the Knights of Templar, which were Catholic-Christians who opposed mass immigration and organized to protect their homeland.
I see it. People will just switch over to physical and digital bitcoin or whatever alternative currency and let the Federal Reserve Notes die a gracious death, along with all United States debt which is in US Dollars.
We have computers and phones which can manage 10 or 100 currencies. This isn't 1923 where there are a few buildings in the country printing money.
They won't quit. Prices on all goods will jump instantly into the thousands. Workplaces will factor in how much more they need to pay you to balance it out.
However, realistically people will just switch over to an alternative currency (which I am sure is in wings) for normal transactions, while the dollars continue hitting US dollar bank accounts and the US dollar debt continues to distill to nothing.
Why? The cost of goods will go up to match inflation. Every month the companies will just put in the inflation percentage adjustment into the inflation adjustment field in their systems as the new payments hit.
Realistically, this would incentivize companies and people to move to an alternative currency that isn't as volatile, which I am sure would be already set up. The US Dollar payments will keep coming in, however, distilling down the debts that are in US Dollars.
When companies adjust the price of goods to match with inflation they will need to go back to work. Companies already adjust the price of goods more than once a month these checks are supposed to be hitting. There is even a percentage built into the systems for inflation adjustments. That percentage number they put in will just be bigger.
The main problem would be whether legacy pos and inventory systems can handle these big numbers, but modern systems appear to be capable of accidentally charging people millions of dollars based on the memes I've seen.
28 trillion per month is 3.696 quadrillion dollars over 11 years.
This link suggests that the worldwide debt is $2.5 quadrillion: "In fact, if we add-in 'the hidden debt' that does not get counted on the financial ledgers, the actual total world debt is $2.5 quadrillion" - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5926213/
So yes, something on this scale may be necessary to erase the debt via mass inflation.
From the article "It will be the first time a portion of borrowers’ paychecks has been at risk since the beginning of the Covid pandemic, when collection activity was halted."
So Trump isn't doing anything except rolling back the Covid economic policies.
The idea that Biden didn't know what bills were being signed or people were being pardoned is just an allegation though. It isn't something I would personally stand up for and champion as truth. It's easily possible that they did brief him on it and that he was giving thumbs up to all of it without much pushback.
And that is what we have for these Freemason claims: Allegations. We don't even really know who the allegations come from. They could come from modern people who hate religiously-aligned organizations, or they could just be modern people who are not specifically anti-religious zealots but who are jumping on a bandwagon that originated in the 1800's by people who sought to smear religiously-aligned organizations.
By backing this without evidence you are agreeing with people who you don't really know, potentially supporting their narrative which seeks to smear the name of good men like George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Mozart, as well as more modern names like Theodore Rosevelt, Winston Churchil, and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.
It is possible that these people were part of a wholly good organization which sought to do good and noble things. It is terrible to besmirch someone without evidence, casting scores of people with good reputations and good achievements in society as potential miscreants. Why are the good and accomplished conservative people in history the most likely people to be in league with Satan, over the people who are making those claims? Allegations are not enough.