Consider if it were a document. I claim the document is fake. You claim that the document is real and point to the document as evidence that it is real. This alone is not a sufficiently valid form of evidence to prove that, as that is the subject matter in question.
There is no evidence either way, so the matter is up in the air.
It is not a document that could be easily faked, it was a speech. You can watch the speech, not a fair analogy.
Further, it would be easy to confirm if it was doctored by locating the original full speech. An internet search shows just about every news outlet running with this. If you really think it is fake it is your duty to go find the original speech and prove that every media outlet is distributing the fake.
It is borderline retarded to claim fake with zero evidence while everyone can watch the speech, which doesn't seem doctored in any way. Did you watch the video?
It is obvious your ego won't let you admit when you are wrong. That is not a good quality.
Maybe it is evidence to you if you don't think that the Deep State has billions of dollars to fake whatever they want with plastic surgeons, CGI, script writers. I do think they have billions of dollars to do things like this, however.
"It's all a movie/fake/lie" is pretty much the premise of Q. So you are in the wrong here by default.
Why? I don't see any difference between my statement that it's fake than your insistence that it is real. Both are assertions without evidence.
wut? r u hi?
Trump posted the video on TS. The video looks real. There is no evidemce it is fake. To call it fake you must provide some evidence.
If it were fake it would be very easy to prove, just find the original speech.
dont be a moron.
Consider if it were a document. I claim the document is fake. You claim that the document is real and point to the document as evidence that it is real. This alone is not a sufficiently valid form of evidence to prove that, as that is the subject matter in question.
There is no evidence either way, so the matter is up in the air.
It is not a document that could be easily faked, it was a speech. You can watch the speech, not a fair analogy.
Further, it would be easy to confirm if it was doctored by locating the original full speech. An internet search shows just about every news outlet running with this. If you really think it is fake it is your duty to go find the original speech and prove that every media outlet is distributing the fake.
It is borderline retarded to claim fake with zero evidence while everyone can watch the speech, which doesn't seem doctored in any way. Did you watch the video?
It is obvious your ego won't let you admit when you are wrong. That is not a good quality.
Maybe it is evidence to you if you don't think that the Deep State has billions of dollars to fake whatever they want with plastic surgeons, CGI, script writers. I do think they have billions of dollars to do things like this, however.
"It's all a movie/fake/lie" is pretty much the premise of Q. So you are in the wrong here by default.
Did you wake up on the retarded side of the bed this morning?