Interesting question on its own, but particularly so since it is the defence asking it...😏
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
If the FBI knew the fake documents came from the DNC (they did, but needs to proven in court) and decided to use that fabricated evidence anyways, then it formally implicates the FBI in criminal activity. If evidence of FBI criminal activity gets entered into court records during this trial, then it means the Sussman trial just turned into a chain lightning bolt that is going to hit a lot of swamp critters.
{edit}
Also, depending on the date the FBI obtained proof of the fake evidence being a DNC product, it could (almost certainly does) mean that the Mueller SC somehow overlooked that exculpatory evidence, or else that evidence was deliberately hidden from, or by{ed.2} the Mueller SC.
thank you
Not only what Toxic said, but it also implicates the FB-lie in the attempted coup of the legitimate government of the US, which is treason. The penalty for treason is DEATH.
I think fire squads was made legal again by Trump :)
Yes it was. Why would he do that? Has there been massive request for firing squads? Maybe he recognized there would be a need!