Ashlanddog posted an article raising such a possibility. You mentioned the judge, but say nothing of the Clinton donors. That's a big thing for Durham to miss during jury selection.
He didn't miss it. He picked the best of a bad bunch. If he didn't pick a Jury there would have been no trial. The Federal government has a 99% conviction rate. I think I'll trust Durham for now.
Nearly alf of the country voted for hillary without knowing any of the true corruption. If a jury needs all Trump voters when presented with the true facts, we have a much bigger problem.
Ashlanddog posted an article raising such a possibility. You mentioned the judge, but say nothing of the Clinton donors. That's a big thing for Durham to miss during jury selection.
He didn't miss it. He picked the best of a bad bunch. If he didn't pick a Jury there would have been no trial. The Federal government has a 99% conviction rate. I think I'll trust Durham for now.
Did you trust Barr?
I still trust Barr. He's playing a role.
Convenient.
What role can he play, now? The "I tried to stop Trump because he's an unhinged maniac" role? Who and how does that serve?
Nearly alf of the country voted for hillary without knowing any of the true corruption. If a jury needs all Trump voters when presented with the true facts, we have a much bigger problem.
Didn't know, or didn't care.