A: The laws of Leviticus were directed at Jews.
B: Many of the psychos in the cabal are unhinged Talmudic Jews who worship Canaanite deities like Moloch
Nope. Good job taking my words out of context though.
Leviticus was directed at Jews. So it makes sense for a post quoting Leviticus would specifically call out psychopath Jews who drink blood thus violating the law of the Torah
Great strawman argument. What you said is not at all what he argued. Way to be a moron.
He is speaking about human blood.
Since Jews (the one who follow the ritualistic Old Testament laws) are forbade to drink blood (in general), the good Jews aren't going to partake in baby sacrifice, human torture, and consuming andrenochrome.
Christians and non-Jews are not bound by Leviticus. There are moral laws in the Old Testament that still apply to Christians but not ritual cleansing laws.
Some argue that there are fake Jews (aka non-Jews or secular bad Jews) that control much of the world and are in the same subset of people who offer sacrifices to Satan to get ahead and stay in power.
OP is actually defending authentic Judaism as valid, not attacking the Jews as you say.
Drinking human blood procures from sacrifice victims is immoral. The rest of the cabal is not off the hook. Leviticus explains why it is wrong from Jewish context. When viewed outside of a Jewish context, it doesn't mean it's okay for every one else to do it.
Read a logic book before posting again. You are either really dumb or a troll. Likely both.
Duh, Mr. Handshake, I asked why she used "Jews" instead of "people." Someone could have answered why other people shouldn't drink human blood either. It seems it would be important to clarify when there is so much theorizing about drinking blood for adrenocrome. So we go to Leviticus because the whole point is to bring up a rehash of the blood libel, which is directed at Jews specifically. At least it's a step forward from all Jews sacrificing a child for Passover to only a few who worship Moloch. If you want to argue logic, you are only pointing out that a distinction was made between "Jews" and "people."
Look at ye, postin' cringe.
A: The laws of Leviticus were directed at Jews. B: Many of the psychos in the cabal are unhinged Talmudic Jews who worship Canaanite deities like Moloch
So it's ok for non-Jews to drink blood, because the laws of Leviticus only apply to Jews. All righty then. The rest of the cabal is off the hook.
Nope. Good job taking my words out of context though.
Leviticus was directed at Jews. So it makes sense for a post quoting Leviticus would specifically call out psychopath Jews who drink blood thus violating the law of the Torah
Great strawman argument. What you said is not at all what he argued. Way to be a moron.
He is speaking about human blood.
Since Jews (the one who follow the ritualistic Old Testament laws) are forbade to drink blood (in general), the good Jews aren't going to partake in baby sacrifice, human torture, and consuming andrenochrome.
Christians and non-Jews are not bound by Leviticus. There are moral laws in the Old Testament that still apply to Christians but not ritual cleansing laws.
Some argue that there are fake Jews (aka non-Jews or secular bad Jews) that control much of the world and are in the same subset of people who offer sacrifices to Satan to get ahead and stay in power.
OP is actually defending authentic Judaism as valid, not attacking the Jews as you say.
Drinking human blood procures from sacrifice victims is immoral. The rest of the cabal is not off the hook. Leviticus explains why it is wrong from Jewish context. When viewed outside of a Jewish context, it doesn't mean it's okay for every one else to do it.
Read a logic book before posting again. You are either really dumb or a troll. Likely both.
Duh, Mr. Handshake, I asked why she used "Jews" instead of "people." Someone could have answered why other people shouldn't drink human blood either. It seems it would be important to clarify when there is so much theorizing about drinking blood for adrenocrome. So we go to Leviticus because the whole point is to bring up a rehash of the blood libel, which is directed at Jews specifically. At least it's a step forward from all Jews sacrificing a child for Passover to only a few who worship Moloch. If you want to argue logic, you are only pointing out that a distinction was made between "Jews" and "people."