Greetings once again Anons and Researchers!
I present to you Chapter VIII of the Department of Defense Law of War Manual — Detention: Overview and Baseline Rules — An Audio and Video Translation
For those of you who have not been following this series, this is a cointinuation of my DoD Law of War audio video project. As mentioned in previous threads, in translating this manual to audio and video, I hope to bring more researchers into the discussion of the Law of War manual.
This manual is a quintessential document for Q research, and should be read, or listened to in its entirety by all members of The Great Awakening board. Indeed it is nigh impossible to understand the inner workings of Devolution without a tertiary understanding of The Law of War.
Please use this thread to discuss any pertinent or interesting findings in Chapter VIII of the Law of War manual as you listen along. It is my intention that these sticked threads be places for for Anons to gather and conduct Q research relating to individual chapters of the Law of War and any connections to the Q postings that may be found within.
Chapter VIII of the Department of Defense Law of War Manual covers the following topics
8.1 - Introduction
8.2 - Humane Treatment of Detainees
8.3 - Security Measures
8.4 - Interrogation
8.5 - Adequate Food, Drinking Water, and Clothing
8.6 - General Conditions of Detention Facilities
8.7 - Segregation of Detainees
8.8 - Medical Attention
8.9 - Administration and Discipline in Detention Facilities
8.10 - Contacts With the Outside World
8.11 - Religious Exercise
8.12 - Intellectual, Physical, and Recreational Activities
8.13 - Adequate Working Conditions
8.14 - Procedures for Detention
8.15 - National Accountability for Detention
8.16 - Criminal Procedure and Punishment
As always, remember Anons
WE ARE THE DIGITAL SOLDIERS
It is our duty and responsibility to read and understand the Law of War. Q coded this manual into their postings for a reason. They wanted Anons to find it, to study it, and to disseminate its core tenants far and wide into the Patriot community.
Make no mistake Anons, Nuremburg 2.0 is coming.
[N]othing [C]an [S]top [W]hat [I]is [C]oming.
Enter The Storm prepared with the knowledge of the Law of War at your side. The enemy is counting on our ignorance so that their criminality may go unnoticed, unpunished, and so that their war upon humanity may linger on in the shadows. Do not let our enemy hide in the shadows of ignorance and uncertainty any longer. The Law of War is a gift that the Trump Administration bequeathed to Anons in order to guide us through these dark times.
I would urge all Anons to take part in the analysis of these chapters. To that purpose, I will outline the methodology in which these chapters can be connected to Q postings below. This methodology was first expanded upon by Carl, also known as Majic Eyes Qnly.
When MEQ analyzes chapters of the Law of War he attempts to find numerical connections that can be formed between Q postings and numbers found in the chapter of the Law of War. The easiest of these to identify would be the chapter subtitles. In today's chapter, the following Q posts may apply to the chapter subtitles for analysis...
Q Posts 81 - 89
and
Q Posts 810 - 816
Additionally, it is worth looking at the chapter footnotes for additional connections to Q posts. While these footnotes have been omitted from my audio series, they can be found in the PDF of the Department of Defense Law of War Manaul found at the following URL:
The original thread with links to all audio / video recordings can be found here.
Alternatively,
The associated Rumble channel, ElevenDotThree, can be found here.
GET DIGGING!
- Qanaut -
Dubious? Which part? You think the civil war was fought over slavery, when 99% of the people didn't own slaves but were willing to fight to the death and sacrifice their children for the 1% who did own them?
You ain't gonna find this in any "sanctioned" history books my friend. Because the same people who run the world write the history books.
History is a lied agreed upon. The banksters, Crown corporation, Vatican have been running the show since time immemorial. If you find that dubious, you've got a lot of learning yet to do and my sources will not be approved by you...
Acting like a condicending prick to people you don't know should be beneath pedes, a bit uncalled for IMO..
I only asked for more source as this is not a theory I had heard before. IF you don't have sauce, or do t feel like sharing, that is one thing. Braying like this only makes you look bad and is not constructive or helpful unless your objective is to make others feel small (also isn't working).
What is with the hostility, are you not a fren?
If you saw my posts, you would know I happen to know a little about history, although not as much as you seem to claim. This is a research site, yes? Why you trying to block research?
Please see my replies to u/cathole953 in this post for a short primer:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15Huxbei9Z/x/c/4OYWuPJBme9?d=50
That was not my intent and apologies if I came off that way. When it comes to what's "really going on", there are several layers one has to pierce through before even attempting to approximate what the truth might actually be.
The best "sauce" you're gonna get it when it comes to exposing the game we're currently playing is incredibly logical and rational theories that start and end with the notion that who is in control today was also in control yesterday, and yester-century, yester-millennia, etc.
So if you already know the banksters, crown, vatican, attorneys, etc. are effectively "in charge" today, we can presume they were in charge in 1859 as well. The next leap of logic is recognizing the nation wouldn't devolve into a brutal and bloody war over something that 99.999% weren't even involved in. It makes zero sense when you stop and think about it - because it's a bald faced lie.
If you then understand the original 13th amendment barred those with "Titles of Nobility" (e.g. "Esquires") from taking part in the American government, but somehow that amendment was "vanished" from public awareness in the coming decades. And then you see Abraham Lincoln, a British BAR attorney Esquire making a run for the presidency 5 different times, the pieces start coming together a bit more.
The banksters needed a "moderator" to convince the southerners to accept a portion of the "United States" HOA debt. Abe was the best man for the job. He ultimately failed. So the banksters brought us war as a result. A war they cooked up and incited then, just as they do now.
Perhaps what I'm trying to say as I run out the door is this; if you understand how things are being done today, then you'll understand how things were done then, and effectively since time immemorial. it's the same game, over and over and over again. But because we don't "know our history", it allows them to keep using the same tactics over and over again.
Can you see the logic in this line of thinking? Can you see that the "reason" for the Civil War we were taught makes zero sense? And do you realize that with the 14th amendment and creation of the political status "U.S. Citizen" that all they did was ended "involuntary slavery" with the 13th by creating their new feudal form of "voluntary slavery" with the 14th by turning the American people into "subjects of the Federal government", where before the American people were the rulers of the "General Government" that existed before it?
Skillful, ingenious inversion. They flipped "we-the-people" from the top of the pyramid to the bottom with the cunning use or words...words with many meanings to be precise. And above all else, ignorance of the law is no defense...
I would hope you would realize that this line of thinking to be very unlikely to find neatly laid out in a "U.S. History book" you can order off Amazon....
About the closest thing to it you can find is a book by Anna Von Reitz called "Disclosure 101: What You Need To Know". I'd say she's got about 80% of what I say in this book. You may find a bit more also in her "You Know Something is Wrong When.....: An American Affidavit of Probable Cause". But I also think Anna's got a few things wrong too. The folks that have a bit more clarity include some less notable "legal/lawful historians and researchers" that occupy little nooks and crannies of the internet.
Another source for you would be Anthony Hitchcock's "Synagogue of Satan" book, here's an excerpt from the appropriate time period: https://www.bitchute.com/video/OrKT5qdQU1fv/
Bottom line, you've got to veer well of the "well trodden path" to understand what's happening. But most importantly, you have to think logically. We've been lied to the entire time. Accepting this, you can begin to unravel all the lies...
Thanks for all the info fren.
One day we will get the full truth out there and have solid answers.