from @xchainlinkx on TS
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
I actually got it from here so I don't deserve the credit 😅
...well you got it anyway fren!!!
...where we howl 1, we howl all....
So take a Monkeypox vaccine to combat the side effects of the Covid vaccine. What a racket.
...exactly....
"We must be ingenious in dispensing the poisons, for they can see far.
We will teach them that the poisons are good, with fun images and musical tones.
Those they look up to will help. We will enlist them to push our poisons.
They will see our products used in film and will grow accustomed to them and will never know their true effects.
When they give birth we will inject poisons into the blood of their children and convince them it’s for their help. "
I don’t doubt it has been said- but can you point me to sauce?
It has been called real and has been called a hoax. Either way, one can point to it and say "This is the world we find ourselves in".
http://www.disleague.com/MassInCure/styled/styled-9/files/the-secret-covenant.pdf
Ty!
Except the monkeypox vaccine only works for monkeypox. What's it going to do given to someone with a compromised immune system?
That's assuming it's actually made for monkeypox. It's just a title for a vaccine after all. What matters is what's in it and what it does.
My triple vaxxed neighbor actually came down with Shingles. Another symptom of VAIDS.
I've had a couple of fully vaxxed idiot friends come down with shingles too. So stupid.
...in response to this....
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.697074/full
I don't have the time to wade through that whole thing, but I will point out 4 things --
(1) It is NOT a scientific paper, since there is no real science being conducted there.
(2) The reason I can say that is the introductory parpagraph. Notice that, except for the first sentence, every other sentence of that paragraph is a statement that is supported by a footnote at the bottom. This is what is supposed to be done in these types of papers. When a statement claiming to be a fact is made, a footnote is used to explain what research backs up that statement as a fact.
But the first sentence/statement of the paragraph does NOT have any footnotes to back up their claim as a fact. What is that statement?
Where is their citation of a paper to PROVE that SARS-CoV-2 is the CAUSATIVE agent of Covid?
There isn't any.
There isn't any in ANY paper ANYWHERE.
The proof DOES NOT EXIST.
That makes the rest of the paper completely moot.
(3) Note the funding. It is all Chinese. That also makes it suspect, even if the paper somehow otherwise seemed valid.
(4) Under Materials and Methods, notice that they were NOT working with any REAL "virus" --
i.e. "It was man-made, not natural."
i.e. "We used PCR to make copies, and then took bits and pieces of that and pretended it was the correct genetic code."
"Recombinant" = They did not exist in the real world until we messed around with them and invented them in our computer simulation.
Now, THAT makes sense.
...doggy grins....