Third Link: https://archive.ph/9znGJ

All samples contained human reads in them, whereas no sample with virus lacked human reads from the data they revealed.

(meaning no virus sample was found that only infected animals and not humans.

it is highly doubtful that ANY original animal infections, if at all, would still be visible at the time of sampling. The initial date of infection happened in [December-9-2019] for the market. Whatever RNA that event left is kept in a highly septic environment in higher than room temperature for more than 22 days before sampling is commenced. By that time, the original virus or animal RNA would have been completely destroyed due to the high room-temperature lability of RNA especially in a septic environment such as the market. All that were left in the environmental RNA samples would have been recently deposited by humans, with a mean date of deposition being close to [December-12-2019].

Sampling— while gDNA survives for years in the environment, vRNA are destroyed within a week in that kind of environment. All virus samples would have been secondary to the human cases by the time of deposition, using whatever methods of transmission (contamination, even spillback from humans into the animals if there are any).