It's not a great way to get people on your side by calling them "retards."
We are in a psywar, whos to say these videos you show are the truth?
It's one theory vs another. One is accepted as mainstream. (doesn't mean its true or false)
This is not the place for random conspiracies, there is a conspiracy board for that. and before you say it's not a conspiracy. Then why does almost no one know/accept this theory, why is it not mainstream?
The following belong on the conspiracies board: (Flat earth, Bluebeam, Viruses aren't real, Everyone is replaced with clones/lookalikes, Aliens built the pyramids, Reptilians, We are in the matrix.)
I dont know why people dont discuss this deeper. What I have read about how viruses were first identified it seemed they were the reaction within the body, not what they are referred to commonly today. Basically, what ever caused the reaction in the body that produced a virus in the body is not actually a virus. But that component is what people commonly refer to as a virus. The resultant "viral reaction" is non transmissable. But what ever caused it could be.
I dont think people should be dismissive of this. This is actual science. Taking the estabishments word for it is not wise.
How is viruses the only thing that gets the honor of being assumed real? Reptilians or Flat Earth? No you have to prove to us.
But viruses? No you have to prove to us they dont exist even thought there is no proof of them existing
You don't prove the norm, you either prove the new idea that then becomes the norm or you disprove the norm.
But what happens when the norm wasnt ever proven?
Why isn't viewing something through an electron microscope proven then?
Again, is the moon real?
I dont know why people dont discuss this deeper. What I have read about how viruses were first identified it seemed they were the reaction within the body, not what they are referred to commonly today. Basically, what ever caused the reaction in the body that produced a virus in the body is not actually a virus. But that component is what people commonly refer to as a virus. The resultant "viral reaction" is non transmissable. But what ever caused it could be.
I dont think people should be dismissive of this. This is actual science. Taking the estabishments word for it is not wise.
Yes. That’s what we call “a virus” — a potentially contagious element that can spread from person to person.
The “viruses aren’t real theory” does not explain away the fact of external contagions.