Im sorry but that in no way puts anything in perspective. Looking at land size needed to occupy a population is irresponsibly linear. How about perspective.
For each human born, given current average lifespan, 72 years, how many more people will they create?, averages- roughly 80 to 100 with a 3 generation extended family.
How much water, food is consumed and impact does a 100 people living on avg of 72 years with a death ratio of 6% ?
-28,200,000 gallons of water(consumed) not used
-290,880,000 gallons of water (used) not consumed
-6768 tons (13,536,000 lbs.) of food consumed
-437,100 trees cleared and consumed
-7,050,000 miles travelled
The power to create a human life is one of the greatest responsibilities we have, it should be used and considered wisely.
Extrapolate this to the world population and it is staggering. There is a reason the term "critical mass" was coined to represent the human population once the benchmark of 4 billion was observed.
Im sorry but that in no way puts anything in perspective. Looking at land size needed to occupy a population is irresponsibly linear. How about perspective. For each human born, given current average lifespan, 72 years, how many more people will they create?, averages- roughly 80 to 100 with a 3 generation extended family.
How much water, food is consumed and impact does a 100 people living on avg of 72 years with a death ratio of 6% ? -28,200,000 gallons of water(consumed) not used -290,880,000 gallons of water (used) not consumed -6768 tons (13,536,000 lbs.) of food consumed -437,100 trees cleared and consumed -7,050,000 miles travelled
The power to create a human life is one of the greatest responsibilities we have, it should be used and considered wisely.
Extrapolate this to the world population and it is staggering. There is a reason the term "critical mass" was coined to represent the human population once the benchmark of 4 billion was observed.