With all the odd old ends stolen forth from holy writ, this and that, it only shows your capacity to repeat something. Very good. Congrats.

It takes away from the issue at hand.

Bandwagonman said: I see objective morality, while not believing in your god. And I concur with him.

How do you read? Have you really even read or contemplated what he claims? Or what I am writing? Or were you just shooting from the hip, and knee-jerking?

I did is demonstrate that there are people who do not belief in YOUR god but do see objective morality.

On the one hand it falsifies the assertions in the meme, which is not even worthy of the name. There is no getting around it.

It is bewildering how you can miss this, as this would be a perfect commonality. But since you refuse to even look into this matter......denial kicks in.

See Q post in relation to the method of critical free thinking.

Is it not interesting to contemplate that Q started posting on the most reviled place? /Pol? Not from the religious pulpits, but a place where the most disregarded people exchange information: autists. Why would that be? Could it be that people like the autists have a behavioral advantage when it comes to critical thinking? A wider view of how society works, how people work?

Something to ponder.

If the discussion is: how can we make clear that those rejecting objectivism, are basically solipsists, which is basically the essence of the system these pedos want us to live under, yeah, I guess we can have that discussion.

As far as I am concerned, the direction you are steering this discussion is a still born, does not yield any knowledge and wisdom.